Want this question answered?
1. Britain would recognize the United States as independent 2. The United States boundaries would be the Mississippi River on the west, Canada on the north, and Spanish Florida to the south 3. The United States would have the right to fish off the coast of Canada 4. Each side would repay its debt to each other 5. The British would return any slaves captured from the Americans 6. The United States Congress would recommend that the states return and property seized from loyalists
1. Britain would recognize the United States as independent 2. The United States boundaries would be the Mississippi River on the west, Canada on the north, and Spanish Florida to the south 3. The United States new boundaries are: as far north as the Great Lakes as far south as Florida as far east as The Atlantic Ocean and as far west as the Mississippi River 4. Each side would repay its debt to each other 5. The British would return any slaves captured from the Americans 6. The United States Congress would recommend that the states return any property seized from loyalists
yes
Loyalists women would wear dresses, corsets, and petticoats to keep warm. Loyalists men would wear trousers, or breeches, shirts and a waist coat.
There were loyalists that wanted to stay with England. They thought that they belonged with England and that it would be foolish to get separated.
You property can only be seized under due process of the law, which means that an order of garnishment would have to be issued by the Court. If there is an order of garnishment, then your tax return will be seized.
1.The United States was independent.Its boundaries would be the Mississippi River on the west, Canada on the north, and Spanish Florida on the south.The United States would receive the right to fish off Canada's Atlantic Coast, near Newfoundland and Nova Scotia.Each side would repay debts it owed the other.The British would return any enslaved persons they had captured.Congress would recommend that the states return any property they had seized from Loyalists.
1. Britain would recognize the United States as independent 2. The United States boundaries would be the Mississippi River on the west, Canada on the north, and Spanish Florida to the south 3. The United States would have the right to fish off the coast of Canada 4. Each side would repay its debt to each other 5. The British would return any slaves captured from the Americans 6. The United States Congress would recommend that the states return and property seized from loyalists
Some property auctions may be conducted by the police department, but only if the property were seized by that agency as lost, found, forfeited, or seized. You would have to check with the individual agency.Added: "Property" as used in this context does NOT refer to real property but to other moveable items and articles.
1. Britain would recognize the United States as independent 2. The United States boundaries would be the Mississippi River on the west, Canada on the north, and Spanish Florida to the south 3. The United States new boundaries are: as far north as the Great Lakes as far south as Florida as far east as The Atlantic Ocean and as far west as the Mississippi River 4. Each side would repay its debt to each other 5. The British would return any slaves captured from the Americans 6. The United States Congress would recommend that the states return any property seized from loyalists
yes
Guns are property just like any other and there is no particular reason why they would be immune from seizure.
what was Tecumseh's perspective on the Loyalists
they would go on with their lives hateing each other
Loyalists women would wear dresses, corsets, and petticoats to keep warm. Loyalists men would wear trousers, or breeches, shirts and a waist coat.
Loyalists would then become either Patriots or they might not even bother to be on any side. This would defiantly make a big difference in the war. The Americans then would have more people to join their army in the fight against the British.
Hamilton defended the Loyalists as a matter of personal principle. He believed that the persecution of Loyalists was in clear violation of the Treaty of Paris, and that it would weaken the character of the country. He therefore saw defending the Loyalists as worthwhile.