Want this question answered?
Technically no. The constitution provides no protection for secession regardless of what hte 10th amendment reads.
Yes, or women wouldn't be voting today. The 19th amendment gave the women the right to vote.
Mukesh ambani got the reliance industries from his father's side. But he upgraded those and he opened many subsidiaries and got rich.
There are some people opposed to the Lautenburg Amendment, and are undoubtedly trying to have it changed. It's doubtful, however, that they'll succeed.
The future tense of "succeed" is "will succeed."
No, "succeed" is a verb. It means to achieve a goal or desired outcome. Example: "She hopes to succeed in her new job."
It is impossible to succeed a thumbwar with a champion
"succeed"
The law is the 22nd amendment to the US constitution. It did not apply to Truman who was the president before the amendment was ratified and took effect. However, Truman chose not to seek a third term.
work hard and you will succeed . To succeed work harder.
Past tense: succeeded Present tense: succeed Future tense: will succeed
Yes, this does happen. One good example is the Equal Rights Amendment. It was passed by congress in 1972 and then sent to the states to be ratified. At first, it seemed the amendment would succeed, but after 35 states had ratified it (it needed 38 to become law), the ERA stalled. There was normally a seven year time-limit for an amendment to be ratified, and although the deadline had been extended, by 1982, time ran out and the Equal Right Amendment failed.