No. The kid is totally responsible after age 18. The exception is negligence or a violation of the law. For example if the adult son hosted a party and the police became involved due to a disturbance or someone was injured the homeowner's could be made a party to any subsequent litigation. In addition case the insurer might refuse to honor claims made related to the incident.
A medical receptionist can be liable for negligence if they fail to perform their duties with reasonable care, resulting in harm to a patient. Negligence could involve miscommunication, inadequate record-keeping, or failure to follow proper protocols that lead to negative outcomes for the patient.
DAO
Only if they signed the note(s).
It depends. Often health-care professionals, because of their expertise, the interpersonal risks they take, and the ethical duties imposed upon them by their profession, become liable for negligence only at a higher standard; that is they may only be liable for gross negligence or at least less liable for ordinary negligence.
Parents are liable for their children until they become legally adult.
Both parents would be liable for support in such a case.
Yes; parents are jointly and severally liable for the support of their children.
Yes, they could be held liable, but only if the negligence is contributable to a loss
They bear no presumption of negligence and are only liable for the dollar value of the erroneous payment that is attributable to their actions.
Yes, they are through their homeowners policy.
Until they reach the age of majority. In most places that is until the age of 18. After that the kids are on there own.
In reference to law, the word "liable "is the act of being held responsible. for example, when there is a puddle on the flood in a grocery store and there is not a wet floor warning sign, if a customer slips and falls, the company will be held liable for the customers injury expenses.