yes carbon would be delta plus and the bromine would be delta negative
A bond between chlorine and bromine, Cl-Br, would be polar covalent.
The bond between hydrogen and fluorine is polar covalent.
CH (triple bond) CH + Br2 -> BrC (triple bond) CBr
The carbon-oxygen bond is a polar bond, but because they are exactly opposed to each other, the molecule is overall non-polar.
The bond between phosphorus and fluorine atoms is more polar than the bond between phosphorus and chlorine atoms.
CuO has an ionic bond, so it would be considered polar.
A bromine-bromine covalent bond would be non-polar, because the two atoms in the bond have the same electronegativity (ability to pull electrons towards themselves).
No, they would form an ionic bond.
A good candidate would be the bond in HF.
This is a polar covalent bond.
In the increasing order, they are non polar covalent bond < polar covalent bond < ionic bond.
Yes. Sulfur (S) and hydrogen (H) will form a polar covalent bond.
Ionic bond The correct answer would be a polar covalent bond.
The electronegativities of nitrogen and fluorine are considerably different. Therefore they make a polar covalent bond.
A polar covalent bond is a bond between two nonmetal atoms with different electronegativity's. Technically, only a bond between identical nonmetal atoms would be truly nonpolar, but in most cases a threshold is set for electronegativity difference to be considered polar.
For a bond to be non-polar covalent, the two atoms involved in the bond would have to have the same electronegativity, so the ∆EN (difference in electronegativity) is zero. An example would be F2 or Cl2 where two halogen atoms bond together, and the ∆EN is zero.
Electrons are shared unequally in a polar bond.