No. The reasons for the war would have still been there. It all started 20 years before with WW1 and blaming the war on Germany. Germany had sanctions placed on it, they had to pay reparations, and couldn't form an army. By the time of the 1930's inflation was out of control and people were out of work. Hitler came along and cued into the emotional needs of the population ( very similar to what Trump has done) and held massive rallies. He was able to get himself elected and then basically overthrew the elected government and took control.
No. The League of Nations had hardly any powers to act and any major decision of the League had to be unanimous, which meant that no single country could push through any policy - and of course at the time the USA was still far from being the superpower it would become after WW 2. And even if the USA had been a member, it was still firmly resolved to not get involved again in any of Europe's present or future conflicts.
No, the USA in not joining the "League of Nations" had nothing whatever to do with the start of the second world war.
convince other democratic nations to join the united nations
many senators thought that joining the league of nations would compromise soverignty in the united states which is why they rejected Wilson´s 14 points.
many senators thought that joining the league of nations would compromise soverignty in the united states which is why they rejected Wilson´s 14 points.
many senators thought that joining the league of nations would compromise soverignty in the united states which is why they rejected Wilson´s 14 points.
many senators thought that joining the league of nations would compromise soverignty in the united states which is why they rejected Wilson´s 14 points.
many senators thought that joining the league of nations would compromise soverignty in the united states which is why they rejected Wilson´s 14 points.
Woodrow Wilson proposed the League of Nations.
There are many things that are can arguably be in favor of the League of Nations. The League of Nations had many social successes by educating nations on the problems of drug smuggling and drug addiction.
Woodrow Wilson.
Lodge was deeply committed to keeping the United States out of an unnecessary involvement in foreign affairs and political matters. The League of Nations would throw America straight into that involvement.
The primary reason was they opposed Article X of the Covenant of the League of Nations. Part of what it would have done is made it so that if one member of the League was attacked by another country, all other League members would have to declare war and help the defender. Senate Republicans led by Henry Cabot Lodge said that that would mean that Congress would lose its constitutional authority to declare war. Their opposition meant that President Wilson was not able to get the two-thirds majority needed to ratify the treaty.
league of nations