answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

They may not have OWNED it but did they live there, rent there, or have some interest in the property? In the US ANYBODY can sue ANYONE for ANYTHING, however, I think your chances of winning such a suit are astronomical.

User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Would a homeowners policy pay negligent intentional emotional distress if the homeowner wrongfully acused you of malious trespassing and booked into jail when they did not own the property you were on?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

What are three torts?

negligence intentional infliction of emotional distress defamation


What is the statute of limitations in Florida for intentional infliction of emotional distress?

4 years


List the main intentional torts against people and property?

Main intentional torts against people include assault, battery, false imprisonment, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and trespass to land or chattels. Against property, the main intentional torts are trespass to land and chattels, conversion, and nuisance.


Distinguish between intentional and unintentional torts?

Intentional Torts- assault, battery, false imprisonment, intentional infliction of emotional distress Unintentional Torts-Negligence, malpractice, recklessness State of Mind is controlling...for more information contact us at http://www.eglaw.com


Interference with anothers enjoyment of life or property?

You may be referring to Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress, and Trespass to Chattels.


What are 6 classification of intentional torts?

It's a little more than 6 but this is what my book has: Battery False Imprisonment Misappropriation of the Right to Publicity Invasion of the Right to Privacy Defamation of Character Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress Malicious Prosecution


If a nurse humiliates a patient in a waiting room using a racial slurs and vulgar language what tort may of occured?

Intentional infliction of emotional distress


A nurse humiliates a patient in a crowded waiting room using racial slurs and vulgar language what tort may have occured?

intentional infliction of emotional distress


Ok your husband has this lady that is trying very hard to get him to divorce you Now is that malicious intent?

Malicious intent refers to a mental state required to commit a crime, which is a matter of criminal law. The situation you are describing could maybe be considered the tortuous act intentional inflictions of emotional distress. Tortuous acts are civil law, so you couldn't have someone arrested for intentional infliction of emotional stress only try to sue them.


Nurse humiliates a patient in a crowd using racial slurs and vulgar what tort occurred?

Most likely intentional infliction of emotional distress. And depending on what was said to the victim and heard by the public, possibly defamation.


What is the difference of intentional and reckless infliction of emotional distress?

My answer would be if the party is very clear to you that you're actions are indeed causing emotional damage and you do not stop. Then it is clear and intentional. It is one thing to say you want to end a relationship, it is another to demoralize, degrade and commit psychological murder, which I define as lying and denying what one is doing which is contrary to reality. It is called driving someone crazy. And pretty soon you don't know what is real and what isn't. Eventually, it will break one's mind down. Perhaps that is psychopathic. Have to research that.


Can you sue someone for disclosure your hiv status without your consent?

Maybe. Obviously, this is a very complex question, because on the one hand you have a right to privacy, but on the other HIV is considered a matter of public health concern. If what they disclosed was true, then it isn't libel or slander. Depending on the jurisdiction, it might be intentional infliction of emotional distress. Not every jurisdiction recognizes the tort of intentional infliction of emotional distress though, and the requirement of mens rea, usually "malice aforethought," is quite high. It is also possible that there was a right to privacy violation, but because HIV could be considered a matter of public concern, it isn't clear that you would win a privacy violation case. For these reasons, it is impossible to give a definitive answer to your question. You ought to consider consulting a lawyer in your area who can give you better answers about how your state treats privacy violations and intentional infliction of emotional distress.