All six Apollo missions that landed on the moon landed on the 'sunny' side, and all twelve astronauts
who got out and walked on the moon walked in the sun. They would have been fried and irradiated
without protection, which is a big part of the reason why they wore space suits. Another reason for the
space suits was the fact that since their assigned tasks on the moon required so much physical effort,
they got together and decided that while they were walking and working on the moon, they wanted to
keep breathing. They needed a way to do that, since the moon has no air, and since they would be in
space suits anyway to avoid being fried and irradiated, it was a no-brainer to put the air in there too.
there is not enough oxygen on the moon for us to breath. There is no atmosphrere on the moon so they would be depressurised and suffocate. They would also be fried from the suns radiation because there is no atmosphere to deflect it away like on earth
Mars does not have a global magnetic field like Earth does. It has remnants of and old global field that may have disappeared 500 million years ago. That would have been the end of protection against the solar wind. It would have stripped the atmosphere off and fried most land life.
the house should have no windows so no one can see u eating fried twinkies
Yes they come from a planet were fried chicken grows on trees the rivers are grape soda and the planet is made of watermelon
The milky way is shaped like a discwith a bulge in the middle rather like two fried eggs placed back to back.
All of the Apollo astronauts who landed on the moon set down on the sunny side, i.e. a place on the moonthat the sun was shining on.Yes, the heat and radiation levels are intense on the moon, because there is no shielding due to atmosphere.Now you can begin to appreciate some of the other important functions of the space suit, besides holding air.
A fried doughnut has a lot of calories in it without being fried so if a doughnut was to be fried it would have to depend on what type of doughnut it is.
No. That would defeat the purpose of 'frying'. You would end up with boiled chicken instead of fried chicken.
Fried, toasted and dead
Jollof rice fried rice Moimoi meatpies fried chicken
A once a year treat for me is to have a traditional English cooked breakfast. Fried bacon (preferably smoked), fried black pudding, sausage, fried tomatoes, fried eggs, fried bread. Slightly more often would be a Melton Mowbray Pork Pie.
They believed fried rats would
It would make it similar in terms of calorie content however there are still differences which would make skinless fried chicken less healthy. Skinless fried chicken would still contain more fat and a lot more sodium (salt).
Because it is fried, a single-serving size would be about 350 to 400 calories.
yes it would , but if you are going to keep cooking , then the germs on both raw and half-fried chicken will die.
I would recommend baked potato. Since the chicken is deep fried, if you also had some form of fried potato, it might make for an overly heavy meal.
Mozzarella And Gravy