No, it would be considered a fragment.
They're is a contraction of "they are". There is a place name substitute. The correct sentence is "They're (they are) going to the store".
David and you is correct. Easy way to remember is to make both singular in a sentence. You would say.. David is going to the store. You are going to the store. Not... David is going to the store. Yourself is going to the store. So when you combine the two they must make sense just as you would speak. David and you are going to the store. Hope this helps.
A sentence fragment is an incomplete sentence. For example these have periods, but are not sentences:I wanted. We were. When I was there. While he was in the store. If you had.
Wasn't is singular, weren't is plural. If the subject of the sentence is just one person or object, then use wasn't. If the subject of the sentence is plural, use weren't."Sarah wasn't going to the store.""He wasn't going to the store.""John and Wanda weren't going to the store.""They weren't going to the store."
I am assuming the question is, "Is this correct?" It is almost correct. The only real error is that there is not a period after "store" to end the first sentence. While there is nothing ungrammatical about this sentence, many people feel that it is more polite to refer to yourself second: "Would you like to come along with him and me?" In addition, it is probably more common to say, "Would you like to come along with us?" This is a smoother, more concise sentence.
No you'd have to say my family and I are going to the store.
No, "The bicycle in front of the store" is a phrase, not a complete sentence because it lacks a subject and a verb to form a complete thought.
Yes, it is an interrogative sentence. So the only thing that is missing is a question mark.
You would say Pat and me at Cisco's. Whenever you are adding another person in a sentence with me or I, you can check yourself by taking out the first name. It will make since if it was grammatically correct. Ex: Kyle and me are going to the store or me is going to the store. Both these sentences are incorrect. You would say- Kyle and I are going to the store or I am going to the store.
They're is a contraction of "they are". There is a place name substitute. The correct sentence is "They're (they are) going to the store".
No
as in : I am going TO the store, are you going TO eat your hot dog
We are going to the store, and we are going to the mall.
David and you is correct. Easy way to remember is to make both singular in a sentence. You would say.. David is going to the store. You are going to the store. Not... David is going to the store. Yourself is going to the store. So when you combine the two they must make sense just as you would speak. David and you are going to the store. Hope this helps.
Comma UseIf you are linking two complete clauses (complete clause meaning containing both a subject and verb), you would use a comma before the conjunction to avoid violating the run-on sentence rule. If the clauses in your sentence share one subject, the comma is not necessary. Examples"I am going to the store, and I will pick up Sam on the way.I am going to the store and will pick up Sam on the way.The comma is omitted in the second example because the second clause does not have its own subject and cannot stand alone.
An example sentence for this could be: Jack is going to the store to pick up a new pair of headphones.
The subject is the one doing the action or what the sentence is about. Examples: She is going to the store. (She is the subject). I am hungry. (I would be the subject). The action that takes place in a sentence is the verb.