Covalently bonded compounds are characterized by a molecular formula, because such compounds exist in the form of discrete molecules, all of the atoms of which move together as kinetic-molecular units. Ionically bonded compounds do not have molecules in this sense: Their compounds are made up of at least two kinds of ions, one positive and the other negative, and the ions in these compounds can move separately as kinetic-molecular units: If a positive ion is separated from the particular negative ion with which it was most closely associated initially in a fluid mixture, usually a solution in an ionizing solvent, of both kinds of ions, another negative ion with the same properties is always close by.
What you write for an ionic compound is called the formula unit, but the formula unit is almost always the same as the empirical formula. The answer to your question could not be the molecular formula because an ionic compound is not a molecule.
Yes, it is possible for an empirical formula to be the same as the molecular formula. For example, Lactic acid's molecular formula is C3H6O3, which would make its empirical formula CH2O.
ionic molecules dissolve the most. but some polar covalent molecules also do dissolve in water.
The molecular formula for iodine pentafluoride is IF5. No prefix in front of iodine is understood to be one, but mono- is not used for the first element in a binary covalent compount. The prefix penta- means five, so the subscript for fluoride is 5. Unfortunately, there is no way to write the 5 as a subscript.
The molecular formula for Penicillin G is C16H18N2O4S (Drug Bank). So five molecules would have 20 atoms of oxygen (5 x 4).
What you write for an ionic compound is called the formula unit, but the formula unit is almost always the same as the empirical formula. The answer to your question could not be the molecular formula because an ionic compound is not a molecule.
The attachment of two hydrogens with X indicates that the valency of X is 2 ,so the formula for fluoride of X may be XF2.
Yes. They would just have different molecular formulas
ionic molecules
That's a very good question and there are arguments for both. I would class it more as a simple molecular substance because a sample will contain many separate molecules, with forces other than covalent bonds between them. A giant covalent structure like diamond is wholly held together by covalent bonds.
molecular
It would be a molecular formula for C3h5o.
Many ionic compounds exist as crystals but covalent compounds as molecules (there are exceptions as diamond though). Ionic compounds would be good electrical conductors unlike molecular compounds.
Yes, it is possible for an empirical formula to be the same as the molecular formula. For example, Lactic acid's molecular formula is C3H6O3, which would make its empirical formula CH2O.
ionic molecules dissolve the most. but some polar covalent molecules also do dissolve in water.
The molecular formula for iodine pentafluoride is IF5. No prefix in front of iodine is understood to be one, but mono- is not used for the first element in a binary covalent compount. The prefix penta- means five, so the subscript for fluoride is 5. Unfortunately, there is no way to write the 5 as a subscript.
No. Two atoms of similar or identical electronegativity would form a nonpolar covalent bond.