Want this question answered?
Yes, as long as the explanation is modified by new evidence.
If I was the scientist you would test is as soon as possible then just skip the hypothesis step
No. Pseudoscience is a belief or practice which claim to be scientific but have not yet proved it. For instance, some people consider Astrology or Psychic Powers to pseudoscience (personally, I feel astrology is not pseudo science). Physics IS a scientific practice and has been proved throughout history.
It is not a bad thing when your hypothesis is not supported, because this shows science working as it should. Something has been learned, and a possible explanation for an effect can be taken off the table, for the most part. The statement is qualified because researchers can now consider whether or not the right controls were put into place, or whether or not there is a more basic flaw in the design of the experiment. If everything is in order, the search for an other explanation gets underway.
The hypothesis must be able to be proved true or false.
Yes, as long as the explanation is modified by new evidence.
Think of possible answers that could relate to the job you are interviewing for. Perhaps there is something fascinating about this industry that initially made you interested in it?
Supported for what? You must give as much background information as possible in your question. It is not always possible to read between the lines of a vague question, but we do our best.
It's very unlikely.
Most probably pseudoscience, called fruitloopery in New Scientist magazine. As shewn, it is a compound word indicating a relationship between pharmaceutics, time, and energetics. Possible but maybe not well founded.
The chance of something happening.
Yes. It is possible to make something like a nerve gear.
no, because if something was impossible, then not everything would be possible.
C does not support templates. Templates are supported by C++ and make it possible to write generic code.
If I was the scientist you would test is as soon as possible then just skip the hypothesis step
If I was the scientist you would test is as soon as possible then just skip the hypothesis step
something to occupy but not mass is solid