yes because food is very scarce whenever you in the military, very hard times but you do get fed maybe every 3 days you will get a little food
hope this helps, From zoey goff
There would not be less hunger. There would be more.
Militarism would likely hinder the art of diplomacy in solving disputes. A focus on military power and aggression can lead to an escalation of conflicts and a reluctance to engage in meaningful negotiations. Diplomacy requires open dialogue, compromise, and finding mutually beneficial solutions, which may be undermined by a militaristic mindset that favors force over dialogue.
I am guessing that The Hunger Games stands for surviving your hunger? That would be my best guess
Why would you need to ignore your hunger? More information is needed.
the hunger laww
You would die of thirst much sooner than from hunger.
A hunger strike is when people didn't eat for a long time, or they would be hungry, so Hunger is hungry; Strike is a period of time.
A hunger strike is when people didn't eat for a long time, or they would be hungry, so Hunger is hungry; Strike is a period of time.
People can die because of hunger because they don't have enough food. If I were you I would be careful.
A bodyguard.
Malta has a long standing reputation in US politics as being dangerously militant
i would if it was a real thing