to end the war, ASAP.
of course it has an inside were else would they keep the nuclear bombs BIATCH of course it has an inside were else would they keep the nuclear bombs BIATCH of course it has an inside were else would they keep the nuclear bombs BIATCH of course it has an inside were else would they keep the nuclear bombs BIATCH of course it has an inside were else would they keep the nuclear bombs BIATCH of course it has an inside were else would they keep the nuclear bombs BIATCH of course it has an inside were else would they keep the nuclear bombs BIATCH of course it has an inside were else would they keep the nuclear bombs BIATCH of course it has an inside were else would they keep the nuclear bombs BIATCH of course it has an inside were else would they keep the nuclear bombs BIATCH
no
Without knowing the yield of your hypothetical nuclear bombs it is not possible to answer this question. Please clarify.
Some bombs are nuclear. But most bombs are not nuclear.
Both basically are the same, they can be fission or fusion bombs like Uranium,Plutonium and Hydrogen bombs. A general description would be that atomic bombs are fission bombs. Nuclear bombs are fusion bombs. Fusion bombs are more powerful weight for weight
'BOOM'
It is difficult to determine the exact number of nuclear bombs it would take to kill everyone in the world, as many factors such as location and size of the bombs would come into play. However, it is estimated that a few hundred strategically placed nuclear bombs could have catastrophic global consequences.
Beacause millions of lives were taken by the nuclear bombs
No, China has several hundred nuclear bombs and has had bombs since 1964.
At this time the US builds no nuclear bombs. A small number of existing bombs are refurbished as needed.
No, this is not a possibility.