No because whatever side Washington was on would have automatically won the approval for the Constitution. He was a public icon and everyone thought he was right.
two thirds of the house approval !!
The Voters ( The People )
yes the congress have the power of approval
A proposal to amend the US Constitution requires a two thirds majority vote in both the House of Representatives and the Senate. After the proposed amendment is approved by the legislature, it goes to the states . It needs the approval of three fourths of the states, or 38 out of 50, to make the new amendment the law of the land.
11.DIFFERENT PERSONTechnically the thirteen British colonies all joined at the same time with the approval of splitting from the British crown. New York was the eleventh to ratify the Constitution, but there was a different government under the Articles of Confederation from 1776 to 1789.
No because whatever side Washington was on would have automatically won the approval for the Constitution. He was a public icon and everyone thought he was right.
They demanded for the Bill of Rights.
The Bill of Right was added to gain approval of the opponents of the Constitution.
The main contribution that the Federalists did to convince the delegates was to create the Federalist Papers, which were documents supporting the approval of the Constitution. Hope this helps. ;)
No because whatever side Washington was on would have automatically won the approval for the Constitution. He was a public icon and everyone thought he was right.
The Federalists Papers were made to help spread approval for the Constitution. While the Constitution was written first, the Papers were publihsed before the Constituion was ratified.
The Constitution was officially submitted to the states for approval on September 28, 1787. From the start, the Federalists had several advantages in their campaign to promote it. # The Federalists drew on the widespread feeling that the Articles of Confederation had serious flaws. The young nation's economic problems and Shays' Rebellion convinced many Americans that something had to be done. # The Federalists were united around a specific plan-the Constitution. The anti-Federalists, in contrast, were united only in their opposition to the Constitution. They had no constructive plan of their own to offer. # The Federalists were a well-organized national group in regular contact with one another. The anti-Federalists tended to consist of local and state politicians who did not coordinate their activities on the national level. # Finally, the Federalists had George Washington's support. In 1786, Washington had foreseen the type of chaos that would erupt from Shays' Rebellion. "Something must be done," he warned his countrymen, "or the fabric [the Union] must fall, for it is certainly tottering." The following year, 1787, Washington had served as head of the Constitutional Convention. Federalists could point out that the Constitution had been crafted under the leadership of the nation's greatest hero and most respected public figure.
The Federalist argued that the constitution needed to be ratified in order to correct the issues of the Articles of Confederation. The Federalist focused their arguments on the benefits of a national government.
The debates in the states lasted ten months. It was an intense and sometimes bitter political struggle. Both the Federalists and Anti-Federalists had many arguments but the most intense ones were 1. Whether the constitution would maintain republican government. 2. Whether the national government would have too much power. 3. Whether or not a bill of rights was needed in the constitution.
It was approval by the states of the constitution.
penis
negro