It's highly unlikely in the US. Most tobacco farmers produce several different crops, of which tobacco is usually a minor one, so they probably would not need new jobs in the first place. Secondly, the US government is having a difficult time finding or creating new jobs for the many thousands of people displaced by the recent economic downturn.
You will need to find a tobacco farmer to see tobacco being grown in Queensland. There are several farmers in North Queensland.
Surprisingly little. Not many tobacco farmers have it as their only crop. Most use it to supplement income from other crops. It would be simple to subsidize their switch to other crops over a period of a couple of years.
the government
That would be the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives.
No they didnt. The they favored business men and merchants. The democrats favored the farmers.
The House of Representitives was formed. And still government power was abused.
No. Tobacco is regulated by the federal government and you would have to pay taxes and get licenced.
Yes and no, mostly yes because many people's lives would be saved but also no because tobacco companies give a lot of money to the government to help out the economy.
The woods of Virginia teemed with animals. Animal skins would be important from the beginning. Salted fish were also important. A few years later, tobacco became the most important product.
The Whiskey Rebellion was a reaction to a new government tax on spirits. After harvest, farmers would distill excess corn that they harvested into whiskey instead of letting it rot. Farmers vehemently opposed this government intervention in their livelihood.
The same as in every other country. The system would collapse.
Many of the farmers I know don't have what they would call "political goals". They simply want big government to stop interfering in how their farms are run.