Want this question answered?
I would say that buying sugar at the equator is more profitable as gravitational pull is less at the equator (you can say almost zero) as compared to the poles (where the gravitational pull is the highest) , so sugar will weigh more at the poles than at the equator. Therefore, we can say that the price of sugar will be more at the poles than at the equator. The sugar will WEIGH less at the equator , so the price will also be less there. Hence, buying sugar at the equator is more profitable.NOTE: SUGAR WILL HAVE SAME MASS AT THE EQUATOR AS WELL AS AT THE POLES.====================================Beautiful. But, since the sell-price of anything reflects both the cost of producing it AND the cost of transporting it to market, have you considered the cost of shipping sugar to the equator from where it grows, compared to the cost of shipping sugar to the poles from where it grows ? When I worked briefly in an industrial complex in northern Alaska ten years ago, the price of a gallon of gasoline there was already over $6 .By the way ... before I go ... the force of gravity at the poles is not "almost zero", and the apparent weight of an object at the pole compared to its weight at the equator is greater on only the order of 1 percent, on account of both the greater radius and the effect of Earth's rotation at the equator.
Mass. . . . . same at the poles as it is at the equator. Weight . . . more at the poles Cost . . . . . more at the poles
These are measurements of weight, not size. A kilogram weighs about 2.2 pounds. So a kilogram of sugar is bigger (would take up more space, has more volume) than a pound of sugar. In fact it would be more than twice as big, 2.2 times bigger in fact. But a 1 kilogram bag of sugar would be virtually the same size as a 2.2 lb bag of sugar.
You can flip the world around so to Nigerians they would say they are above the equator, but to people in North America, you would say Nigeria is below the equator. Nigeria is in the southern hemisphere.
The granulated sugar would react more quickly, as it has more surface area to react in.
There are 2 cups of sugar to a pound, so 1 lb 10 oz would yield slightly more than 3 cups of sugar.
1 lb of sugar weighs exactly the same as 1lb of feathers. a pound is a pound is a pound.
I would say that buying sugar at the equator is more profitable as gravitational pull is less at the equator (you can say almost zero) as compared to the poles (where the gravitational pull is the highest) , so sugar will weigh more at the poles than at the equator. Therefore, we can say that the price of sugar will be more at the poles than at the equator. The sugar will WEIGH less at the equator , so the price will also be less there. Hence, buying sugar at the equator is more profitable.NOTE: SUGAR WILL HAVE SAME MASS AT THE EQUATOR AS WELL AS AT THE POLES.====================================Beautiful. But, since the sell-price of anything reflects both the cost of producing it AND the cost of transporting it to market, have you considered the cost of shipping sugar to the equator from where it grows, compared to the cost of shipping sugar to the poles from where it grows ? When I worked briefly in an industrial complex in northern Alaska ten years ago, the price of a gallon of gasoline there was already over $6 .By the way ... before I go ... the force of gravity at the poles is not "almost zero", and the apparent weight of an object at the pole compared to its weight at the equator is greater on only the order of 1 percent, on account of both the greater radius and the effect of Earth's rotation at the equator.
1 pound of lemons.
Mass. . . . . same at the poles as it is at the equator. Weight . . . more at the poles Cost . . . . . more at the poles
energy of 1lb of sugar = 1712 Cal sorry but i cannot find the energy provided by fat. Can someone please add it if you know it.
You're trying to compare weight and volume. It doesn't really work properly. A pound is 16 ounces, and a cup is 8 fluid ounces, so you would expect a pound to be 2 cups. The problem is that the density of the sugar is a variable. If you pack the sugar into the measuring cup, it will weigh more, thereby coming out to more than a pound in weight.
Sugar free because if it is sugar free it s way more healthier
Slightly more than 2 cups of brown sugar is in 1 pound.
These are measurements of weight, not size. A kilogram weighs about 2.2 pounds. So a kilogram of sugar is bigger (would take up more space, has more volume) than a pound of sugar. In fact it would be more than twice as big, 2.2 times bigger in fact. But a 1 kilogram bag of sugar would be virtually the same size as a 2.2 lb bag of sugar.
Peanut
it depends on the size of the crystal, powered sugar obviously has more than a normal bag of sugar. You could have a one pound crystal of sugar too, it's far to many to count in any of these cases.