No, a flustered person may have trouble speaking clearly because they may be feeling anxious, overwhelmed, or stressed, affecting their ability to articulate thoughts coherently. This can lead to stuttering, repetition of words, or speaking in a disjointed manner.
No, it is not grammatically correct to say "what all do you expect." A more correct way to phrase this question would be: "What do you expect?" or "What are your expectations?"
You should say "we are expected" when referring to something that is anticipated or required to happen. "We expect it" would be used when indicating your personal anticipation or belief about something.
I would speak slowly and clearly, use simple language, and offer to repeat information as needed. Additionally, I would try to utilize visual aids or written instructions to help convey information effectively. If necessary, I would also consider using a language translation service to assist in the communication process.
An example of enunciation would be a public speaker speaking clearly and distinctly, articulating each word with precision for the audience to understand easily.
No, "you" is a second person pronoun used to refer to the person or people being spoken to. A first person pronoun would be "I" or "we."
The child became flustered when questioned by his mother about his test scores.
If a person thinks clearly,decides wisely and alert they would be practice
My grandpa was always a little flustered at trying to "figure out these mechanisms!"
Balance and muscle coordination.
You would expect a person to remove heat energy via freezing.
when they have an affair with someone else
You would expect a person to remove heat energy via freezing.
To "anticipate" means to expect or predict. So a person who anticipated the lottery result would be the person who would win the jackpot.
cooking, creative arts and art
The person might expect the golf ball to be able to be thrown much farther with the same strength as another object of the same weight and size.
A:I would expect the same standards from a moral religious person as from a moral non-religious person, no less. The one important difference would probably be the person's own assessment of the reason for his morality. The moral religious person is likely to attribute his or her morality to guidance from God; the moral non-religious person is likely to attribute his or her morality to conscience and a desire to do good for others.
It would help to answer the question if there was any information about the shape itself: a triangle, a parallelogram, ... Clearly, that was too much to expect.