In a sentence you would use 'furthest' over 'furthest most.' "Furthest most' is redundant and many readers would begin to question your intelligence if you were to write that. I would know because I still remember the talking to that my teacher gave me for using it in 2nd grade. If I were you I would stick to 'furthest.'
If the solvent used is nonpolar, then the component that moves furthest would be the least polar component. If the solvent is polar, then the most polar component moves furthest.
Furthest East? It would go in the order: Londonderry - Belfast- Cardiff - Liverpool - Norwich With Londonderry being the most Westernly city and Cardiff just being a bit further west than Liverpool, but by only a fraction.
I hope were talking about real life? lol i would say math and science will get you the furthest
Logically, it would be the Seattle Mariners, as they are the furthest geographically from any other team in their division.
You can embed a quote in a sentence or you can just say, e.g. He said "apples are red" embedded that would be: I argued that apples were green but "apples are red" is the most common view
Pluto
When the bob is furthest from the centreline.
Evidence and statistics are most likely found in a supporting sentence.
Most certainly not.
The Taklamakan Desert is the furthest west.
In The End, Man's Best Friend Really Is Just That.
No that would not be proper English. Best by itself in a sentence is correct.