Yes! You need to use an onomatopoeia when making or using a sound.
No
if you said "huff" then i would say that it is an onomatopoeia. and onomatopoeia is simply a word that embodies a sound ex. pop, crack, bam
There is no opposite of onomatopoeia (the phonetic imitation of natural sounds). To have non-imitative sounds would be counterproductive.
Clang would be one, but clanging would not be one.
no, impact is a verb (though it can be used as a noun). It describes the actual event of one object hitting another, not the sound it makes (which would be an onomatopoeia). "Bam" might be the onomatopoeia best describing an impact.
"Groan" could be an onomatopoeia because the sound of the word itself is similar to the sound someone would make while they were groaning. Grooooaaaannnn :/
Nothing
The penny will zig zag till it hits the bottom, the same way a a piece of paper would if you held it up and dropped it. It would be easier to drop a marble or a pebble.
To say "the cat purred" would be an example of onomatopoeia. A cat would normally say "miaow" or "prrrr".
if you said "huff" then i would say that it is an onomatopoeia. and onomatopoeia is simply a word that embodies a sound ex. pop, crack, bam
a rock, i would think
Onomatopoeia is a word that says what it sounds like.
There is no opposite of onomatopoeia (the phonetic imitation of natural sounds). To have non-imitative sounds would be counterproductive.
No, because the sound doesn't suggest the meaning of the word.In this case, bang would be an example of onomatopoeia.
The word skid is probably not an example of onomatopoeia. Skid doesn't really sound like what it describes. Screech is something that would be pegged as onomatopoeia.
Clang would be one, but clanging would not be one.
No, "nod" is not an onomatopoeia because it does not imitate a sound. Onomatopoeias are words that phonetically resemble or suggest the sound that they describe, such as "buzz" or "hiss."
Bang!