Yes they do for they are still members of the church even though the church employs them. Church employment is no different to having a job outside of the church. I was organist and musical director in a church for 17 years - a paid position through a sizable honorarium. There was no problem in me being on the council, and I had full voting rights. The only time I left a meeting out of courtesy was when I was actually the object of discussion - e.g. if the council reviewed my pay. I then slipped out of the room for that agenda item only, so that I could not be seen to bias the vote, nor be accused of voting myself a payrise!. At such times, the minutes recorded my vote as an abstention. Otherwise, there was absolutely no problem me being their and my opinions were always greatly valued. == Whether they can vote in a different capacity depends on the constitution and/or bylaws of that church.
Whether it is legal for church members who do not tithe to vote on church matters depends on the specific rules and bylaws of the church. Some churches may have membership requirements related to tithing, while others may not. It is best to refer to the church's governing documents for guidance on membership and voting rights.
Sometimes, but usually the church council decides who will become the next pastor. If the church has no council, then the clergy members of the church will come together and decide which one of them will be pastor.
I have never heard them called anything other than "member of the parish council".
Settled controversy between trinitarians and arians, also decided on other church matters such as the date of easter
The ecumenical council refers to a conference of the theological experts and the ecclesiastical dignitaries convened to settle and discuss matters of the various practices of the church. It is also called the oecumenical council.
No. The monarch is a head of the church, but is not able to carry out services and the monarch or government are not employers of the members of the Church of England.
The first council of the church after New Testament times was the First Council of Nicaea, which took place in 325 AD. It was called by Emperor Constantine to address the Arian controversy regarding the nature of Jesus Christ.
Council of the Church was created in 1835.
No, they didn't. Some of the matters brought up by Luther were legitimate complaints - the sale of indulgences as well as immoral members of the clergy, etc. These were corrected during the Council of Trent. However, many of the things that Luther proposed were contrary to Catholic Doctrine and were rejected by the Church.
The ecumenical council refers to a conference of the theological experts and the ecclesiastical dignitaries convened to settle and discuss matters of the various practices of the church. It is also called the oecumenical council.
Paris council members who wanted a decentralized government, separation of church and state, and other socialist reforms. :)
A:Constantine called the First Council of Nicaea, with the objective of getting agreement among the bishops on matters of theology. As emperor, he regarded himself as the supreme leader of the Christian Church, but allowed the bishops to reach their own consensus at the Council.