One Opinion
Disclaimer, and appeal to avoid a flame war: I'm assuming based on the wording of the question that the person who asked it has spanked their son in the past and is okay with it as a parenting practice in general terms, even if they're unsure about this situation. Arguing for or against spanking as such would seem to be off topic.
My first thought is, if he hates being grounded so much that he'd rather be spanked, that probably means the grounding is an effective punishment, which is an argument for continuing with it. On the other hand, if he's mostly a good kid, there's something to be said for listening to a request like this if it seems reasonable. Having a kid who's grounded can be a disruption to the family schedule, and getting a punishment over with quickly is pleasant all around. If you did decide to start spanking him again, I would have three main concerns. First, he's right on the border between being a little kid and a teenager, and not very far from hitting puberty. You need to watch out for potential problems with modesty or sexuality which could come up, even if he's not currently aware of them. Second, depending on how long ago you stopped spanking him, he may think it would be an easy way out, or have unrealistic expectations. A spanking he gets at age 11 would likely need to be much more severe than what he got before, and he would need to understand this going into it. Third, if the spanking hurts more than he remembers or expects, he might try to change his mind and go back to being grounded. That's not necessarily unreasonable, but a kid shouldn't be able to just dictate a change in his own punishments whenever he feels like it. I would probably offer to let him take a spanking just to see what it's like, then if he still wants to go with that instead of grounding, agree to do it that way for some period of time, maybe six months or a year, before re-evaluating.
Contribution, retribution is a punishment.
Boudicca reveived no punishment from the Romans. It is said she poisoned herself rather than face the consequences.
Than*
You could, but this would be incorrect grammatically. Rather, you should write "Attached is a copy of your request."
The term is a request for a face-to-face meeting to resolve a problem or incident. It is often linked to the response "meeting per your request" which is rather overly-specific grammar.
Retributivists
Various philosophers and legal scholars have challenged the concept of punishment in different ways. Some argue that punishment should focus on rehabilitation rather than retribution, while others question the effectiveness of punishment as a deterrent. Additionally, concerns have been raised about the fairness and proportionality of certain punishments in the justice system.
It depends on the crime rather than the punishment in felony cases.
It is unfair to Joby as the request is based on personal bias rather than Joby's performance. The general should evaluate Joby objectively to determine if he is fit for the promotion, rather than dismissing him based on unfounded assumptions.
Yes, in Matthew 25:46, where Jesus says, "And these will go away into everlasting punishment, but the righteous into eternal life." The punishment is not an eternity in hell as many teach - from Dante's 'Inferno,' but rather the 2nd death - total oblivion, no longer existing.
Taht's a rather gruesome request but you will find what you want at the following url: http://history1900s.about.com/library/holocaust/msubh68.htm
It was the custom to use a whipping boy when corporal punishment was to be inflicted upon a royal or other person of high status. The whipping boy suffered the punishment rather than the person who had committed the offence.