answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Private costs can also be borne by producers.

For example:

A consumer buys a unit of good, the private cost of him is mainly the price of the good.

A producer supplies a unit of good, the private cost of it is the cost of production.

There should be no definite answer for "who bears the private cost?".

Social costs = Private costs + External costs.

It's born by both consumers and producers.

Look up external costs in the internet.

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Private costs are borne by consumers of a good while social costs are borne?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

What is the difference between private cost and social cost?

Hi Private costs are those incurred by the firm producing the goods/services, whereas social costs are those paid for by society. For instance, cars. The production costs and the cost of raw materials etc... are all private costs, however the CO2 emissions and the damage they cause to the environment is an additional social cost. Hope this helps Sam x


What would be a sentence using the word borne?

The legal costs were borne by the borrower and not the lender.


What are private costs?

Private costs are the expenses of a supplier or producer. They are the costs incurred in provision of services or products.


What are concerns that socially responsible consumers have?

Production costs.


Social cost benefit analysis?

Summary Social cost/benefit: sum of all private costs/benefit. Social welfare analysis: involves optimising social outcomes based on cost/benefit. Optimal occurs: where marginal social cost (MSC) = marginal social benefit (MSB) Is used for: cost of economic choices, policies, initiatives, etc. Longer Explanation Social cost-benefit analysis is also known as 'welfare analysis' and is very similar to normal firm optimisation models. Essentially, social cost and benefit usually involve a private producer or consumer and a public provider or public demand. In these cases, the private cost/benefit of the private actor differs from the social cost/benefit. A social cost/benefit is simply the sum of all costs and benefits of all private actors. Cost is represented on a cost-quantity axis as a positively-sloped function (linear or higher power) and benefit is a negatively-sloped function. Their optimisation occurs where the derivatives of cost and benefit (marginal social cost; marginal social benefit) are equal. This point is where profit/social welfare is greatest.


How is market failure cause environmental degradation?

It is when the private marginal benefits or costs are not equal to social marginal benefits cost. Therefore, result could be likely market failure.


Why cost being borne by the consumer or manufacturer?

The determination of which costs are born by the consumer of manufacturer often depends on the position of the company. If they are trying to increase sales by undercutting the competition they will often bear more of the cost. However, eventually all costs will have to be borne by the consumer in order for the company to stay in business.


Is considering opportunity costs is a rational thing for consumers to do?

What you sacrifice for a decision is one of the non-monetary costs of many choices.


What is considered one cause of inflation?

Producers raise prices to meet increased costs, which causes costs to consumers to rise.


Is considering opportunity costs is a rational thing for consumers to do what?

What you sacrifice for a decision is one of the non-monetary costs of many choices.


What is considered one cause inflation?

Producers raise prices to meet increased costs, which causes costs to consumers to rise.


Is it possible for perfect competitive market to be inefficient?

It is possible for perfectly competitive markets to be inefficient when externalities are present. Externalities arise when an economic activity has an unintended impact on other economic agents and/or the market. This results in there being a socially optimal level of production that does not coincide with the privately determined equilibirum level of production derived from the supply and demand curves (which, respectively, represent the marginal private costs and marginal private benefits to producers and consumers). With respect to the efficiency of markets, positive externalities result in too little of the good in question being produced. In this case, the market equilibrium is lower than desired (the marginal social benefit curve lies above the marginal private benefit [demand] curve). In this case, the efficient market outcome would occur where the marginal social beneift curve interests the marginal private cost (supply) curve. When negative externalities occur, too much of the good in question is being produced. This results in the supply curve, which represents the marginal private costs of production, lying below the marginal social cost curve because the private cost curve fails to take into account the costs of production incurred by all of society. In this case, the efficient market outcome would occur where the marginal social cost curve coincides with the private marginal benefit (demand) curve.