the camaro easily outran the mustang because even the smallest camaro engine the 327 outperformed the small mustangs 289. the camaro also came with a 350 so the mustang did not have a chance
a 67 mustang cost about $30,000
289 4v 225 hp
No you can not, the 67 had a different body style than the 65-6
67
nope
the 67 camaro has a triangular side window vent that can be pushed open and 68 and 69 do not have that http://members.socket.net/~g6007/68/68drivers.jpg (68 camaro) http://www.buyoldcars.com/info/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/67camaro-smallpic-cutout.jpg (67 camaro) hope these links are useful
No, they were subtly different between those years
The ( 1968 ) Ford Mustang 200 cubic inch straight 6 cylinder spark plug gap is ( .035 inch ) I'm assuming the 1967 was the same ?
about 10 mpg
The 1967 Camaro had a stock 3.8L straight sixThe SS model had a 5.7L 350 or an optional 6.5L 396 (L78) big blockThe 67 Camaro was actually the debut platform for the 350
the 67 mustang r code is said to push 450 horsepower for insurance reasons but actual dyno testing had dyno'd 650+ horsepower out of the 427
No. Not only are they different, but, the 69 camaro is a little bit wider than the 67-68. Most people do not know that, but, they are. The rear spoiler is a give away. 67-68, have their own, but the 69 is wider.........Chuck.