Maine and Nebraska allow for the splitting of their electoral votes. I think they both award one elector to the winner in each Congressional district and give the other two votes to the over-all state-wide winner.
To be declared the winner, a candidate needs at least 270 electoral college votes.
Using either the district plan or the proportional plan to reform the electoral College would NOT ensure that the winner of the popular vote become president.
the Electoral College
Yes, in most states. Maine and Nebraska split their votes by congressional district.
The Electoral College itself does not encourage any particular style of campaigning.What matters is that the individual STATES typically allot electoral votes on a "winner take all" basis. (Some, such as Maine, allot electoral votes on a congressional district-by-district basis.)So, since California was clearly going to go to the Democrats and Texas to the Republicans, neither presidential candidate campaigned there. Both candidates focused their attentions on the "battleground" states that could have voted either way.If California were to allot electoral votes on a district-by-district basis, then instead of Obama getting all of California's electoral votes, Obama would have gotten about 60% of them, and McCain would have received the rest. (In California, the big cities vote overwhelmingly Democrat, while the central valley and mountain districts are strongly Republican.)
electoral college The Electoral College probabably electoral college
The Electoral College.
Presidents of the US are elected by the electoral college, they are not elected directly by the public. The public (in effect) elects the electors who form the electoral college. It has happened on several occasions that the winner of the popular vote was not the winner in the electoral college.
Maine and Nebraska are the only states that do not award all of their electoral votes under multiple-winner plurality. In both states, the state at large has two electoral votes elected unti multiple-winner plurality. Each congressional district in these states also has a single electoral vote allocated using single-winner plurality, making it possible for the state to give electoral votes to multiple candidates.
Winner-takes-all applies to all but 2 states currently members of the United States of America. Winner-takes-all refers to the representation of the state in the electoral college. Where it applies, the party candidates (more specifically their delegates) take up all seats in the electoral college of the state. If 50.1 peolple of one state vote Democratic, the Democratic delegates receive all seats in the electoral college of this state. If winner-takes-all does not apply to the state, there are other rules governing the allocation of seats, such as proprotional allocation or district-based allocation.
Pennsylvania casts its electoral votes in the U.S. Electoral College on a winner-take-all basis. The winner of the popular election in Pennsylvania gets all of Pennsylvania's electoral votes.
no
Texas casts its electoral votes in the U.S. Electoral College on a winner-take-all basis. The winner of the presidential election on Election Day in Texas gets all of Texas' electoral votes.
Nebraska and Maine... I found this answer at the electoral college FAQ website
Electoral college
No it is a winner takes all state.
By popular vote.