A dictator can certainly get things done in a hurry - but curiously, most dictators have not been good at getting things done.
Of course. If you don't think so make a visit to communist China, Russia, or other countries that are not democratic.
Noope
do you think the mita system was a good goverment policy why or wht not
England is part of the United Kingdom. The government of the United Kingdom is a constitutional Monarchy. The laws are made by a democratically elected parliament.
Assimilation policy adopted by the US government was not a good idea because it led to unnecessary racism and elements of bigotry as it does not respect immigrant cultures.
Its not a very good form of government.
Of course. If you don't think so make a visit to communist China, Russia, or other countries that are not democratic.
i think it is good
Noope
i love u
A complex question, to complex for this form There is a good description of their government on WIKI pedia
i think this government has good for enough common sense
Most cities have a mayor council form of government. Both the mayor and the council are elected and make decisions that are based on the good of the city.
It depends on your point of view, if you think the government is doing everything wrong, then you would think that, but if you think that the government is doing a good job, you would disagree.
Good question! For me, a parliament form of government is a good alternative form than the present Philippine government because there are only few people that can handle political positions in the country. This means that only few are able to access power. Because only few people are in power, the people could monitor the activities of the government, there are no rooms for corruption and "under the table" activities because one could easily pin point who is to blame. A transparent government is what the Philippines need!
Aristotle believed monarchy was the best form of government because he thought a virtuous ruler would prioritize the common good. He saw the potential for a single leader to make quick and effective decisions, avoiding the challenges of a democracy where different factions could lead to conflict and instability.
do you think the mita system was a good goverment policy why or wht not