yes i think that congress has too much power
The anti-federalists feared that the federal government would have too much power, and that states would have too little power. George Mason was a prominent anti-federalist.
The constitution keeps the power evenly distributed between the three branches of government by using a system of checks and balances. This basically means that if one branch is exceeding the limits of power, another branch can "check" it. For example; if a president (the executive branch) is gaining too much power and enacting unfair laws, congress (the legislative branch) can vote to impeach the president or something like that and "check" the president's power. Likewise, if congress exceeds its limits, the judicial branch can declare a bill or law unconstitutional and check the power of congress. Each branch has a little power over the other, which balances the power.Hope this helps (:
yes because the government had a lot of power and could control the citizens but with asking the presedient first
the founders and writers of the us constitution did not want to give the president too much power so instead they gave that power to congress for a group of people to decide on not just one person
There are many reasons, but the main ones are: 1. It did not have a Bill of Rights 2. They believed it gave the federal government too much power, and therefore the states too little power 3. They feared it left too much room for corruption
Yes Congress has relinquished too much power to the President.
An example of Congress having too much power is the fact that they can impeach even the president. The Congress is the part of the legislative branch of government.
too little
Nobody..congress is there so that the President doesn't gain too much power but Congress doesn't hold all the power either..
they gave the government too little power
NO! He opposed it because he believed it gave too much power to the poor.
The anti-federalists feared that the federal government would have too much power, and that states would have too little power. George Mason was a prominent anti-federalist.
In this act, congress states that the president had too much power in sending troops over seas. They decide to limit the power of the president.
NO. The Anti-Federalists who opposed the US Constitution were angered that the Constitution gave too little power to the states and too much power to the federal government.
they thought that they would give one man too much power.
The constitution keeps the power evenly distributed between the three branches of government by using a system of checks and balances. This basically means that if one branch is exceeding the limits of power, another branch can "check" it. For example; if a president (the executive branch) is gaining too much power and enacting unfair laws, congress (the legislative branch) can vote to impeach the president or something like that and "check" the president's power. Likewise, if congress exceeds its limits, the judicial branch can declare a bill or law unconstitutional and check the power of congress. Each branch has a little power over the other, which balances the power.Hope this helps (:
They are the government, by their nature they control policy of the government in power.