answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

The Constitution provides that when the President dies or otherwise cannot perform his duties as President, the vice president will then serve as President. This continues until the President is healthy or, in the event of a presidential death, until the next election cycle.

User Avatar

Wiki User

9y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: The president suffers an illness and dies What does the COnstitution provide?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about American Government

How is the order of succession to the presidency determined?

Vice PresidentSpeaker of the HousePresident Pro Tempore of the SenateSecretary of StateSecretary of the TreasurySecretary of DefenseAttorney GeneralSecretary of the InteriorSecretary of AgricultureSecretary of CommerceSecretary of LaborSecretary of Health and Human ServicesSecretary of Housing and Urban DevelopmentSecretary of TransportationSecretary of EnergySecretary of EducationSecretary of Veterans AffairsSecretary of Homeland SecurityNote that that if the vice-president becomes president or otherwise vacates his office, a new vice-president would be chosen as soon as possible. This list would be used only if both the president and vice-president died within a very short time period. Note also that if the holder of one these offices is not qualified to be president, then he will be skipped over in the list.This list is according to congressional guidelines passed in 1947,The Constitution sets forth the guidelines for presidential succession. In the event that the president dies or is removed from office, the vice president takes the oath of office and becomes the new president. He or she then appoints a new vice president, subject to congressional approval.The Constitution gives Congress the right to decide the order of presidential succession in the event that both the elected president and vice president die or are removed from office.The 25th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, passed in 1967, provides for procedures to fill vacancies in the Vice Presidency; and further clarifies presidential succession rules.However, the 25th Amendment does omit some critical information concerning presidential succession.There are two different concepts here: a person holding the Executive Office of the President of the United States (the actual president), and a person who is an Acting President (allocated presidential powers). Normally, these are the same person. However, there are a number of common cases where a different person occupies each role. This has important ramifications for the presidential succession. Also, note that any person who may potentially become Acting President must qualify for the presidency (i.e. be a natural born citizen, et al), otherwise, they can never be a temporary president. If such a person holds one of the offices on the succession list, they are passed over to the next person should the need arise.The 25th Amendment only somewhat improves the succession process; it does make clear that the vice president is to assume the office of the president (i.e. become the holder of the office of the president) should the current president die or resign. Article II, Clause 6 of the Constitution was not completely clear if the vice president merely became a temporary president, or actually assume the position of President.The 25th Amendment also provides for a method by which the vice president plus a majority of the Cabinet can temporarily force the president to step aside. In this case, the president retains the office of the president, but the powers of the presidency fall to the vice president, who is now the Acting President. The 25th Amendment also indicates how the president can contest this temporary removal, and possibly regain the powers of the presidency (at which time, the vice president is stripped of his/her allocated powers).The rest of the succession is set by federal law, and is not mentioned by the Constitution (or any Amendment). This law is the Presidential Succession Act of 1947, which attempts to define a complete succession. This law is what states that the succession goes to the Speaker of the House, then the President Pro Tempore of the Senate, then through the Cabinet. However, there are significant ambiguities as to whether the person that now holds the office of the president, or is merely the acting president (while legalistic, this does have some impact on actual law) - most interpretations are they are merely acting president.In addition, none of the documents deal with the all-too-common problems of immediate temporary succession. The 25th Amendment requires a majority of the Cabinet (the principle executive officers of the US) to agree to allow the V.P. to take over should the President still be alive. The Presidential Succession Act mentions "inability" as one qualifier to allow for succession to take place, but that has never been defined:The president is seriously injured, but still aliveThe president is unconscious, but aliveThe president cannot be reached, but is assumed to still be aliveThe president is taken hostageThe president is presumed dead, but there is still the possibility he is aliveThere is not a current majority of the Cabinet available (either enough of them have died, or they cannot be contacted effectively)The president is dead (or alive, but not functioning), and the vice president is unavailable in any way.There is no vice president and the president goes insane (or, suffers a mental breakdown, mental illness, etc.)In all of these cases, there is no functioning Acting President - the current holder of the office of the president has not relinquished it, and no law allows for a quick (temporary) assumption by someone else.These problems are serious. For, with no one as Acting President, the military chain of command has no leader, no legislation can be passed, and other severe consequences.A common example is an attempted Presidential Assassination. For instance: when President Reagan was shot by John Hinckley in 1981, Reagan was immediately rushed to the hospital, unconscious. In the mean time, it took quite a number of hours before Vice President George H.W. Bush (who was flying back to Washington, D.C. on Air Force Two) was able to assemble enough of the Cabinet to allow him to assume the powers of Acting President. Given that this was in the depth of the Cold War, the United States was without a leader for 6-10 hours.The fundamental issue is that there is no current method for allowing the next person in the succession to immediately take over unless the one ahead of them is dead. The rest of the succession policies take considerable time, during which no one has the authority of Acting President.


Why is the term bedridden politically incorrect?

In keeping with the "person first" descriptions of people with disabilities, the correct description should be a person "unable to sit out of bed". "Person" first, then a physical description. An example: "Mary's daughter has autism", not "Mary's daughter is autistic", or worse, "Mary's daughter suffers from autism".


Why was it insure instead of ensure in the Preamble?

To ensure means to be careful to preserve and protect while to insure means to guarantee against loss. An insurance policy pays reparations if the thing it guarantees against loss suffers loss. I believe the founding fathers were well-educated men and would not have preserved a document that substituted insure for the intended ensure. We should not rewrite what has been written but understand the meaning as written. Because the document the preamble was introducing was to be the law of the land, but had not been ratified and this was not yet the law of the land, if this had been an error there would have been plenty of time to correct the mistake. No, the preamble got it right in that it looked forward to the establishment of a system of law that had never before existed and the founders felt that reading the Constitution in a way that would best fulfil the intent laid out in the Preamble would insure that peace would be an integral part of the liberty upon which the nation was being founded. After all, isn't this what forms the basis for the idea that all men are created equal and that they are endowed with their Creator with certain unalienable Rights and that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. If domestic tranquility were not insured, it could be broken with impunity and if it were to be constantly interrupted, how could life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness, endowed by God, be preserved?


Who is Will Duddy?

David Law was formerly an employee of ETSA Torrens Island Power Station (now run by AGL). In court, he alleged that as a result of electromagnetic radiation (EMR) emitted from the power lines and other high voltage equipment (e.g. transformers), his life was ruined by the causation of chronic insomnia (inability to sleep) due to the 275,000V power lines. The issue is the disease is not a direct causation, and does not always necessarily follow. This may also be due to the fact ETSA employees are usually blue-collar workers and generally get drunk on alcohol after work. David Law also accuses Angelo Contibas and William Harrod (his team leaders) of both civil and criminal harassment, abuse, and threats. He was coerced to work under high-voltage power lines, whilst Angelo Contibas, for instance, stood backwards and watched (there is some evidence he may have suspected the effects of electromagnetic radiation). Other team members include Ray Pniewski, and William Harrod, who were just as negligent by standing back. As a result of duty of care, and operation of CURRENT tortious law and the Worker's Liability Act (WorkCover), ETSA should have compensated David Law by almost $2.5m. Instead, they compensated him by $4,995 because WorkCover was not in operation, and because David Law now suffers from a mental illness as a result of ETSA's actions. ETSA is the Electricity Trust of South Australia, now a privatized company. The real fault lies in the SA Government's fault, almost thirty years ago. Duddy Shopov Lawyers also isn't really helping, not putting in first interests of the disabled. You can do this by lobbying the Law Society of South Australia to have Will Duddy (aka William Duddy), Christopher Shopov, Jenny Gillespie, Bianca Ayres, and Claire Victory, who work for the company. The professional organization can put pressure on these lawyers to drop their ongoing support of ETSA against David Law, in the interest of the disabled. Lawyers should NOT be apart of ordeals with relation to disabled people. This is an IMPORTANT move in politics that NEEDS to occur. WE ARE FIGHTING TO LOBBY THE SA GOVERNMENT TO HAVE THE INTERESTS OF THE DISABLED PUT FIRST! More info: http://www.etsaemr.com/ http://www.youtube.com/etsainator http://www.petitionspot.com/petitions/etsaemr http://www.gopetition.com/online/34202.html (Content posted under the Freedom of Speech provision of the United States Constitution)


What best describes the relationship between the US and oil?

Many statements might fit here:What began in the late 1800s as a love of oil (and the potential wealth oil brings) has turned to a love-hate relationship with oil. Oil has a wealth of uses, but also a wealth of consequences.The United States uses one-quarter of the world's energy.The United States is the second-largest producer of oil in the world.The United States imports more oil than any other country.The United States suffers from a blind and selfish dependency on oil.The United States struggles with ending its dependency on oil, especially when lobbyists fight this.The United States argues with itself over off-shore oil drilling. Catastrophes would truly be catastrophic, but the "oil race" continues.

Related questions

What happen the persident suffers from a mental illness and don't think he is?

what happens if the persident suffers from a mental illness and the persident thinks he is ok.


Who suffers from imaginary illness?

The term is hypochondriac. The cure is called placebo.


When does a person suffers from ECG?

Never. An ECG is a test, not an illness or disease.


What illness does roderick suffer?

Roderick suffers from a variety of nervous disorders, including acute bodily illness. This illness manifests in heightened sensitivity to light, sound, and touch, as well as acute anxiety and insomnia.


What is the illness collamatocractcoolnessdepobia?

Its an illness of the prefrontal cortex of the brain and makes you too cool for school. It is a very rare disease and one living person today suffers from it, Julz DGiovanni.


Percentage of canadin anorexia?

An estimated about 1 in every 250 people is anorexic, or suffers form an anorexia-like illness.


How many Canadians are anorexic?

An estimated about 1 in every 250 people is anorexic, or suffers form an anorexia-like illness.


How does Frankenstein react on seeing Henry's corpse?

He falls over his body and weeps. APEX


What does manic aggressive mean?

There is no such illness. Perhaps you are thinking of manic DEPRESSIVE. This is an illness where the person suffers from uncontrollable mood swings. Sometimes they feel so horrible they can't even get out of bed. At other times, they feel full of energy and elation.


A girl that i had a brief fling and who suffers from a mental illness told me things that she should have told her boyfriend however i haven't heard from her since.?

This is not a question. It is a statement with a question mark after it.


Mental illness one symptom is jealousy from everone if one person haves something or doing some thing with boyfriend or girlfriend?

Mental illness is defined as being unpredictable or erratic. A person which suffers from mental illness usually displays this when asked to answer a question or concentrate on something specific. This person would not be able to do this. Uncle Nate


Does Brian Williams a smoker?

Unfortunately, he IS a smoker, so he suffers the mental illness and other brain damaged caused by addiction to the ILLEGAL tobacco drug, which must be BANNED NOW!