0
What was the reason for superpowers to engage in an arms race with a strategy of mutually assured destruction?
Wiki User
∙ 10y ago
Both countries felt that they were safe from attack if they were powerful enough to destroy the other.
Anonymous
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What did Roosevelt tell people about banks in his fire side chats?
He explained his policies and assured people that he could help them through the DepressionAPEX
The Habeas Corpus Act assured a person of a trial within?
Twenty days
What did Roosevelt tell people during his fireside chats?
He explained his policies and assured people that he could help them through the DepressionAPEX
The advantages during the Cold War?
Were often out-weighed by the disadvantegous, that's what kept it Cold. The framework was quickly established of MAD, or Mutual Assured Destruction in which the Soviets and the West knew that the first offensive nuclear attack might, or probably would end the world as we knew it. The USSR had a manpower and rocketry advantage, while the West had a Naval advantage and a Short Range Ballistic weapons advantage combined with a superior detection and alert status. In truth, the US had a gigantic advantage until the USSR began placing weapons in Cuba.
What did the anti federalist want the bill of rights to be included in the constitution?
The Anti-Federalists wanted a Bill of Rights to be included because, the country had just fought a war because they felt they were losing those rights and they wanted to be assured that their goverment could never take them away.
What was the reason for superpowers to engage in an arms race with strategy of mutually assured destruction?
Both countries felt that they were safe from attack if they were powerful enough to destroy the other.
Why did the two superpowers never fire a shot?
Based on weapons stockpiles, there was mutually assured destruction if the two superpowers went to war
How do you know Mutually Assured Destruction really worked?
Because if it didnt, the two superpowers would have started a nuclear war which would have begun world war 3
What was the reason for superpowers to engage in an arms race with a stragety of mutually assured destruction?
Both countries felt that they were safe from attack if they were powerful enough to destroy each other.
What did the acronym MAD stand for?
Mutually Assured Destruction
What was the reason for superpowers to engage in an arms race with a strategy of mutualky assured destruction?
Both countries felt that they were safe from attack if they were powerful enough to destroy the other.
Mutually assured destruction and its policies were developed around what weapon?
Mutually assured destruction and its policies were developed around high yield H-bombs that were usually carried by missiles.
What was the cold war strategy whereby the us was prepared to engage in massive nuclear retaliation at any time?
MAD, which stands for Mutually Assured Destruction
What is The defense strategy predicated on the assumption that if no one stood a chance of surviving a nuclear war then no one would start one?
Mutually assured destruction.
Cold war strategy whereby the us was prepared to engage in massive nuclear retaliation at any time?
Mutually Assured Destruction (MAD) Brinkmanship
What moral question was the heart of the arms race?
Mutually assured destruction
Why did the west not declare was on the USSR?
Wanted to avoid "mutually assured destruction."
