The argument which was used by Progressive Era reformers to support the use of graduated income tax was that those people who earned more were to pay more in taxes.
people who earn more money should pay taxes at higher rates
to pay for programs to help all americans - apex
we needed a central voice to represent america
Precedent precedentprecedent
Industrialists' support for technology benefited the economy.
people who earn more money should pay taxes at higher rates
The temperance movement was a reform movement that opposed excessive use of alcohol and advocated "temperance," or abstinence from alcohol. The reformers' argument was that men who drank excessively would spend most of their money on alcohol rather than on food for their families. Additionally, these men were usually very abusive.
A: few whites, no matter how liberal, believed that blacks were actually equally to whites. man, fxuxcxk plato.
The temperance movement was a reform movement that opposed excessive use of alcohol and advocated "temperance," or abstinence from alcohol. The reformers' argument was that men who drank excessively would spend most of their money on alcohol rather than on food for their families. Additionally, these men were usually very abusive.
Evidence to support the argument is needed for a sound argument.
Yes- Wilson was considered to be a progressive Democrat. He advocated votes for women and a graduated income tax for example and favored government action to prevent monopolies.
evidence to support the argument
Providing evidence to support an argument strengthens it by adding credibility and persuasiveness. It shows that the argument is based on facts and research, making it more convincing to the audience.
yes it was successful because of the help from the reformers America became a safe and successful country
to pay for programs to help all americans - apex
Advocacy- Active Support or argument for a cause
The argument from silence is when the absence of evidence is used to either support or refute a claim or theory. If there is no evidence to support a claim, it can be refuted using the argument from silence. Conversely, if there is a lack of evidence against a claim, it can be supported using the argument from silence.