Fourth Chief Justice John Marshall (1801-1835) made that declaration in the Supreme Court's decision for Worcester v. Georgia, (1832). Marshall also stated the federal government had a duty to protect the Cherokee Nation from Georgia's aggression, but the Congress and President Jackson ignored the suggestion because it wasn't part of the legal ruling.
Case Citation:
Worcester v. Georgia, 35 US 515 (1832)
The Supreme Court of Virginia seats seven justices who are elected to twelve-year terms by a majority vote of both Houses of the Virginia General Assembly. In addition to the regular justices, the legislature may also select as many as five retired justices to one-year terms to assist and to hear cases when a regular justice is unavailable.
A supreme court is the highest court within the hierarchy of many legal jurisdictions. Other descriptions for such courts include court of last resort, instance court, judgment court, apex court, and highest court of appeal. Broadly speaking, the decisions of a supreme court are not subject to further review by any other court.
No. Slavery was abolished by the Thirteenth Amendment to the Constitution in a joint effort between Congress and the states that ratified the amendment. A constitutional amendment is more powerful than a US Supreme Court decision, because it is not subject to change by the Supreme Court.
Apex-type question, not rephrased, subject is covered abundantly.
The Supreme Court heard the case under original jurisdiction because the Judiciary Act of 1789 assigned to the Court the responsibility for all writs of mandamus. However, John Marshall determined the Constitution hadn't granted the Supreme Court subject matter jurisdiction over Marbury's case, and that the proper initial venue would be federal District Court.Therefore, while the Court determined Marbury was entitled to his commission, they couldn't compel Secretary of State Madison to deliver it. Had Marbury wanted to pursue the matter further, he would have to refile in District Court. If he wasn't granted satisfaction in the lower courts, then the Supreme Court could properly hear his petition under its appellate jurisdiction.Marbury never refiled the case, and never became justice of the peace.Case Citation:Marbury v. Madison, 5 US 137 (1803)
Jackson thought that the Cherokee would be better off in Indian Territory because it was not subject to action by individual states.
Jackson thought that the Cherokee would be better off in Indian Territory because it was not subject to action by individual states.
Barbara L. Benge has written: 'The 1890 Cherokee Nation census, Indian Territory (Oklahoma)' -- subject(s): Census, 1890, Cherokee Indians, Genealogy 'The 1880 Cherokee Nation census, Indian Territory (Oklahoma)' -- subject(s): Census, 1880, Cherokee Indians, Genealogy
The President checks the power of the Supreme Court by appointing Supreme Court justices and the Chief Justice (subject to Senate confirmation).
The President checks the power of the Supreme Court by appointing Supreme Court justices and the Chief Justice (subject to Senate confirmation).
Im pretty sure its jurisdiction.
Im pretty sure its jurisdiction.
Samuel Joseph Konefsky has written: 'Chief Justice Stone and the Supreme Court' -- subject(s): United States, United States. Supreme Court 'The legacy of Holmes and Brandeis' -- subject(s): United States, United States. Supreme Court
Brian L. Porto has written: 'May it please the court' -- subject(s): Administration of Justice, Justice, Administration of, Political aspects, Political aspects of Administration of justice, Political questions and judicial power 'The Supreme Court and the NCAA' -- subject(s): National Collegiate Athletic Association, Law and legislation, United States. Supreme Court, United States, College sports, Antitrust law
The Executive Branch. The President appoints, subject to approval/ confirmation by the Senate.
"Cherokee" is the simple subject in that sentence.
Sudesh Kumar Sharma has written: 'Integrated rural development' -- subject(s): Rural development 'Distributive justice under Indian Constitution' -- subject(s): Equality before the law, Constitutional law, Distributive justice 'Studies in Indian administration' -- subject(s): Politics and government, Civil service 'Inside Delhi Assembly' -- subject(s): Politics and government, Delhi (India : Union Territory). Legislative Assembly, Delhi (India : Union Territory), History 'Inside Delhi Assembly' -- subject(s): Politics and government, Delhi (India : Union Territory). Legislative Assembly, Delhi (India : Union Territory), History 'Directive principles and fundamental rights' -- subject(s): Economic policy, Civil rights 'Union territory administration in India' -- subject(s): India (Republic), Union territories