The Tinker, or Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District, was a Supreme Court decision. Justice Abe Fortas wrote the majority opinion.
the people who were inoved are Joan tinker merrybeth tinker
A Judge who believes that he is biased should recuse themselves. If the Judge believes that he can fairly adjudicate the case, then he can; but most would not simply to avoid any appearance of prejudice.
Judge and mocercy
entitled to the freedom of expression.
Recuse... judge is asked to step down due to conflict or other reasons.
No idea
They both were involved in a Supreme Court
The judge vacated the date in the case.
Tinker Vs. Des Moines
The people who won the Tinker v. Des Moines, (1969) case were the students (Tinker) whose First Amendment right freedom of speech was upheld by the Supreme Court.Case Citation:Tinker v. Des Moines, 393 US 503 (1969)
Tinker v. Des Moines, (1969) stemmed from three students' protest of the Vietnam War.
Yes, a judge can overrule another judge in a court case if they believe the previous judge made an error in their decision or ruling.
The parties involved in the case of Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District were Mary Beth Tinker and her brother, John Tinker, along with Christopher Eckhardt, who were students protesting the Vietnam War by wearing black armbands. The defendants were the Des Moines Independent Community School District and school officials who suspended the students for their actions. The case centered on students' First Amendment rights to free speech in a school setting.
Yes, a judge can dismiss a civil case if there is not enough evidence or if the case does not have legal merit.
To Protest the War students wore armbands and were suspended Students Sued the school district for not allowing them the right of freedom of speech Lower courts ruled in favor of the school district Students took the case to the Supreme court and won
He files a motion for an order to have the Judge recuse himself from the case.
It will depend on what the judge says. If the judge dismisses the case "With Prejudice" it means that the case cannot be brought again. If the judge dismisses the case "Without Prejudice" it means that the case can be brought again and the person could be charged again.