Patrick Henry and Amos Singletree, in my opinion. Mostly Patrick Henry though because he was a firebrand and his speeches had a great effect on people.
Amos Singletree feared that they would put well educated people in charge and then the educated leaders would shove the new ideaqls of the nation down the simple folks' throats.
He feared that the new constitution would be used by the "lawyers and men of learning, and monied men" to "get all the power and money into their own hands"
Because he thought the Constitution favored the rich over the poor
because slaves were property protected by the constitution
they wre afrais that if they would ratify (officialy approve) the constitution that they would lose their independence. *by lori
because it would give too much power tho the government
This question can't be answered because we are not given the reasons or who is asked about.
The anti-federalists objected the constitution because they thought it made the central government too strong and feared that the US would become a monarchy.
Maurice Amos has written: 'The English constitution'
the constitution did not include a bill of right...
the constitution did not include a bill of right...
James Madison did not oppose the ratification of the constitution. In fact he encouraged it by helping to write the Federalist papers with Alexander Hamilton and John Jay.
the constitution did not include a bill of right...
the constitution did not include a bill of right...
i know the answer but i oppose answering this question!
They were afraid of being to much like Britain.
because slaves were property protected by the constitution
The constitution united the American people, not the states
they wre afrais that if they would ratify (officialy approve) the constitution that they would lose their independence. *by lori
they wre afrais that if they would ratify (officialy approve) the constitution that they would lose their independence. *by lori