0
Why did the authors of the articles of conferderation provide for a weak government?
Wiki User
∙ 10y ago
The Articles of Confederation were the first attempt to provide a central government for the United States, but it proved to be too weak. The authors of the Articles, like many Americans, were afraid of creating too strong a central government. Having just defeated England in the Revolutionary War and having won their independence from England's strong government, Americans wanted to be sure that the government they established would not be so strong as to take away their liberties and to interfere in their local affairs. The Articles provided a weak central government in which the real power remained in the hands of the states.
Wiki User
∙ 10y ago
Wiki User
∙ 14y agoThe American's made the Articles of Confederation weak because of the fact that they were scared of a strong overpowering government similar to the way they were governed by British Parliament.
Wiki User
∙ 13y agoThe states were afraid of having another tyrannical government like England was, so they tried to make the government weak to prevent corruption.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Why did Americans want a stronger government than the one created by the Articles of Confederation?
Americans wanted a stronger government than the Articles of Confederation provided for a number of reasons. The Articles of Confederation lacked the necessary powers to govern effectively leaving it unable to enforce laws collect taxes or provide for a unified military. The Articles of Confederation also did not have any means of resolving disputes between the states. Furthermore the Articles of Confederation did not have a strong executive branch and could not create a unified currency. Finally the Articles of Confederation did not allow for the direct participation of citizens in the government and it was difficult to amend the Articles of Confederation. The Articles of Confederation lacked the necessary powers to govern effectively leaving it unable to enforce laws collect taxes or provide for a unified military. The Articles of Confederation did not have any means of resolving disputes between the states. The Articles of Confederation did not have a strong executive branch and could not create a unified currency. The Articles of Confederation did not allow for the direct participation of citizens in the government and it was difficult to amend the Articles of Confederation.These shortcomings of the Articles of Confederation led Americans to seek a stronger more effective government that could better meet the needs of the nation.
What is the last article in the Constitution?
Constitution has three partsPreamble-IntroductionArticles-tell how the government worksAmendments
Which plan did not provide for a national court system?
The Articles of Confederation did not provide for a national court system. The Articles of Confederation were eventually replaced by the U. S. Constitution.
How did the US Constitution overcome the weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation and provide for the organization of the new government?
The Articles of Confederation had several weaknesses. As a result, a new plan of government, the Constitution, was written to clear up the weaknesses. Under the Articles of Confederation, there were many things the federal government couldn't do. It couldn't tax, make trade treaties, resolve disputes between states, keep order, and pay its debts. To help solve these issues, the writers of the Constitution created a federal government with three branches. Each branch had distinct powers to carry out its responsibilities. Additionally, the government had the ability to create an army. This army could be used to keep order at home as well as fight wars with other countries if needed. The Articles of Confederation can't be criticized for being a weak government because it was set up to be a weak government. However, the Constitution was much better, in part because the writers of the Constitution learned from the past mistakes that were made. They also included an amendment process to correct future problems that might arise. The Constitution was written, in part, to correct the mistakes and resolve the issues that existed in the Articles of Confederation.
How did the us constitution overcome the weaknesses of the articles of the confederation and provide for the organization of the new government?
The Articles of Confederation had several weaknesses. As a result, a new plan of government, the Constitution, was written to clear up the weaknesses. Under the Articles of Confederation, there were many things the federal government couldn't do. It couldn't tax, make trade treaties, resolve disputes between states, keep order, and pay its debts. To help solve these issues, the writers of the Constitution created a federal government with three branches. Each branch had distinct powers to carry out its responsibilities. Additionally, the government had the ability to create an army. This army could be used to keep order at home as well as fight wars with other countries if needed. The Articles of Confederation can't be criticized for being a weak government because it was set up to be a weak government. However, the Constitution was much better, in part because the writers of the Constitution learned from the past mistakes that were made. They also included an amendment process to correct future problems that might arise. The Constitution was written, in part, to correct the mistakes and resolve the issues that existed in the Articles of Confederation.
What is the general purpose of the articles of conferderation?
The full name was Articles of Confederation and Perpetual Union. The purpose of the Articles was to provide a general government for the 13 colonies that had won their freedom from British rule and to bring about "perpetual union" of these new states.
The of the U.S. Constitution provide(s) the outline of the federal government.?
Articles
What criticism of the articles of confederation and which government did they say they had too much of it?
The main criticism of the Articles Of Confederation was to provide adequate powers for the central government. The State Government had too much power.
Why did the Founders throw out the Articles of Confederation and start over?
Because it did not provide a strong enough central government. Because it did not provide a strong enough central government.
Are the articles in the constitution the same as the articles in the Articles of Confederation?
No they are not the same. The Articles of Confederation didn't provide the power for the government to collect taxes, for example. No, they "were" not the same* *Different author from the first paragraph.
Did the articles of confederation provide a strong system of checks and balances for the federal government?
No. That's why they wrote the constitution.
Did the Articles of Confederation provided the US an effective government?
The Articles of Confederation did NOT provide the United States with an effective government. It lacked many powers that we now have. For example the government in the 1780's couldn't impose taxes, it was unicameral, and it could not declare war. If it would have been effective we would still be under the power of the articles instead of the constitution.
What are two weaknesses of articles of confederation?
There were at least two major weaknesses in the Articles of Confederation. The first was that it did not provide enough revenue for the central government and it did not allow for person liberties of the citizens.
Why did the government under the articles of confederation last only a few years?
Failure of Articles of ConfederationIt didn't provide a strong central government. the states acted completely independent of each other. acting for their best interest and not that of the states.
How do authors write claims in factual articles?
Authors write claims in factual articles by presenting a clear statement that asserts a particular viewpoint or argument based on evidence and research. They often support these claims with facts, data, examples, and quotes from experts to provide credibility to their argument and persuade readers of its validity. It is important for authors to ensure that their claims are accurate, logical, and well-supported to maintain the integrity and credibility of their article.
Why did the articles of confederation fail to provide for an executive and judicial branch of government?
LOL! i had this same question for homework. shame :P
Why were the Articles of Confederation inffective?
It allowed each state to act as an independent government within the government. A central government is needed to provide services, protection, and to see to the common good of ALL citizens.
