answersLogoWhite

0

The role of a Supreme Court justice is to interpret the constitution, not make (or change) law or impose one's personal preferences or views. Therefore, upon examination of the constitution as it relates to a particular case, a justice may conclude that a previously held view is not constitutional. This is, of course, in an ideal system. Supreme Court justices are human.

User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago

Still curious? Ask our experts.

Chat with our AI personalities

TaigaTaiga
Every great hero faces trials, and you—yes, YOU—are no exception!
Chat with Taiga
RossRoss
Every question is just a happy little opportunity.
Chat with Ross
ReneRene
Change my mind. I dare you.
Chat with Rene

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Why does a judge who shares a president's views when first appointed may rule differently on cases later?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp