It upheld the concept of "Dual Citizenship," thereby declaring that the Bill of Rights only applied to the national government.
In the case of Varon v Baltimore in 1833 the Supreme Court decided that the Bill of Rights could not be applied to state governments but only to the federal government. Later rulings have mostly negated this ruling.
The case Gitlow V. Newyork ruled the complete opposite, overturning it.
Gibbons v Ogden
Barron vs. Baltimore
The case must be unique and important in order for the Supreme Court to accept the case. The case can also be accepted if it is to resolve a conflict of law.
It upheld the concept of "Dual Citizenship," thereby declaring that the Bill of Rights only applied to the national government.
In the case of Varon v Baltimore in 1833 the Supreme Court decided that the Bill of Rights could not be applied to state governments but only to the federal government. Later rulings have mostly negated this ruling.
Barron vs. Baltimore
Barron vs. Baltimore
In Barron v. Baltimore (1833), the Supreme Court ruled that the Bill of Rights, specifically the Fifth Amendment's protection against the taking of private property without just compensation, did not apply to state governments. The case centered on John Barron's claim that the city of Baltimore's actions had harmed his wharf business without compensation. The Court, led by Chief Justice John Marshall, held that the protections of the Bill of Rights were intended only to limit the federal government and did not extend to state actions. This ruling established a significant precedent regarding the application of constitutional rights at the state level.
In Barron v. Baltimore (1833), the Supreme Court ruled that the Bill of Rights did not apply to state governments. The case involved John Barron, who claimed that the city of Baltimore had violated his property rights by dumping sand in the harbor, rendering his wharf unusable. The Court, led by Chief Justice John Marshall, concluded that the Fifth Amendment's guarantee of just compensation for property taken by the government was applicable only to the federal government, not to the states. This decision established a precedent for the interpretation of federalism and the limits of federal power over state actions.
Barron vs. Baltimore established that The Bill of Rights only applied to the Federal Government, and therefore State and Local Governments were not obliged to extend the same rights to their citizens.
The case Gitlow V. Newyork ruled the complete opposite, overturning it.
Gibbons v Ogden
Barron vs. Baltimore
Those pictures would be in the case files of the Baltimore police. You may be able to find some in newspaper archives.
The legal age to rent a hotel room in Baltimore, Maryland is 18 years of age. This is the case in most locations.