No "Taxation Without Representation" was important to the Americans back then because they really didn't have the money to pay the taxes anyway. Also, they already hated the British and didn't want to pay taxes that a house of representatives didn't approve of. So really that was why the idea of no taxation without representation was important.
They did not like the idea of taxation without representation.
Representation Colonists had no one representing them in British parliament. Their money was taken away from them by people living an ocean away who had no idea what their lives were like and how they struggled and their money went to a country that cared little about them and did little to support them. No one in Parliament was on their side. Taxation should never happen without representation.
The Stamp Act was the first document in which the English believed they were being taxed without representation. The Stamp Act required all formal documents to use a British seal and be printed on British supplied paper.
They thought that it was unfair because the tax was too high and the colonists were unable to afford it, they had thought the laws were unfair because England was trying to control them. the colonists wanted independence and were not going to pay the unfair tax on everything. taxation but no representation e.g. vote or voice
It was a result of a compromise between the North and the South. The North wanted slaves to be counted for taxation purposes in the South to bring in more revenue for the federal government which was something the South did not want. But the South wanted to count slaves towards in population in terms of representation so they could have more members in the House of Representative which the North did not want. In the end they settled upon the idea that each slave counted as 3/5 of a person, both in terms of taxation and representation.
They did not like the idea of taxation without representation.
It means that nobody should be taxed if they cannot vote.
They thought just tax them no one can stop us
budget (plato)
In a group of people who act perfectly with others and who step up to do what is needed to be done without pay you could have no government without taxation. But, face it even the Amish have a governing body and they are very good people. So the whole idea of a nation not having representation or military provision or police or schools and no taxation is ludicrous.
Representation Colonists had no one representing them in British parliament. Their money was taken away from them by people living an ocean away who had no idea what their lives were like and how they struggled and their money went to a country that cared little about them and did little to support them. No one in Parliament was on their side. Taxation should never happen without representation.
The Americans felt that Parliament's laws couldn't touch them because they didn't have actual representation. They had virtual representation, meaning that every Parliament member represented the whole empire.
The Stamp Act was the first document in which the English believed they were being taxed without representation. The Stamp Act required all formal documents to use a British seal and be printed on British supplied paper.
The Stamp Act was the first document in which the English believed they were being taxed without representation. The Stamp Act required all formal documents to use a British seal and be printed on British supplied paper.
He disliked the British idea that they could essentially do whatever they wanted to the Colonists without even following it themselves. His ideas represented the concept that "taxation without representation" was unjust.
The Revolutionary War had just been fought. One of the issues that prompted it was the idea that there should be no taxation without representation.
Three-fifths of a state's slave population counted toward representation and taxation.