Although the British East India Company had reduced the price on their tea (due to the Tea Act), this was just a way to hide the taxes of the Townshend Acts from the colonists. Aware of these taxes, the colonists refused to purchase ths tea, refusing to accept that the British had the right to tax them. They protested during the Boston Tea Party, where they dumped the tea into the Boston harbor.
The colonists protested the passage of the Tea Act. One infamous event was the Boston Tea Party, in which protesters destroyed a shipment of tea.
The Intolerable Acts, particularly the Boston Port Act, angered colonists the most as it closed Boston Harbor until the East India Company was compensated for the tea destroyed during the Boston Tea Party. This act not only crippled the local economy but also symbolized British oppression, leading to widespread outrage and unity among the colonies against British rule. The punitive nature of these acts galvanized colonial resistance and ultimately contributed to the outbreak of the American Revolution.
1775, right after the tea tax
The Tea Act of 1773 gave British tea companies a hegemony over all the American tea trade. The Tea Act was created to provide protection for the British East India Tea Company, which was struggling against competition, as well as a way to tax the colonists.
The Townshend Act was passed in 1767 after the Colonists rebelled against the Stamp Act. The Townshend Act was a tax on glass, paint, lead, tea and other things the Colonists needed.
They destroyed the tea in protest of the Tea Act. This act required the colonists to exclusively purchase tea from the British West Indies Company. This angered the colonists because they could not purchase tea from other countries for better quality or price.
Colonists
It was not actually a "tea party". They dumped 342 chests of tea into the Boston Harbor to protest the Tea Act which required the colonists to exclusively purchase tea from the British West Indies Company. This angered the colonists because they could not purchase tea elsewhere for better prices or quality.
" No Taxation without Representation." In 1773, Britain passed the Tea Act. This law gave British company the right to control all trade in tea. The colonist still have to pay tax. This angered colonial merchants and other colonists.
The colonists were angry because they thought they should have some say in how high or low their taxes are. (Wouldn't you be, too?)
They were angered by the Quarter Act because it required them to house and feed British soldiers at their own expense.
The Stamp Act was put into place without any kind of representation from the colonies. This angered the colonists, and led to the Boston Tea Party.
Taxes, stamp act,tea act
This was also about taxes. It angered colonists because they did not feel they should have to pay high taxes simply to use sugar.
The colonists were angered by it.
Which act is the question referring to? Assuming the question is referring to acts enacted by the British Parliament, concerning the American colonists in the "Thirteen Colonies" of British North America, colonists were often angered most by those acts which impeded their financial or physical freedoms. The two which tended to draw the most ire were those acts which raised taxation (such as the Stamp Act and Sugar Act), and those which limited the ability of colonists to obtain land and expand (such as the infamous Proclamation of 1763.)
The Tea Act let the company bypass the tea merchants and sell it directly to the colonists. The Intolerable Acts were four laws that the English colonists passed because they were so harsh. There was a fifth law that was called the Quebec act. It was a setup government for Canada, that gave complete religious freedom to french catholics.