The word 'at' is not a verb and so doesn't have a past tense.
Destroyed is the past tense of destroy...therefore there is not a past tense for destroyed.
The past tense is smote.
"Responsible" is an adjective. It does not have a past tense. Instead, the past tense would apply to the word before. (Present - she is responsible, Past - she was responsible.)
The past tense of clean is cleaned.
"I ate pizza, and it was tasty."
The past tense is ate.(Be careful - eat is an irregular verb which means the past participle is different. The past participle is eaten)The present tense is:I/You/We/They eat.He/She/It eats.The present participle is eating.The future tense is will eat.
Eaten is the past participle of eat, not the past tense. Ate is the past tense.
NO ... Ate is the past tense of Eat
"Ate" is the past tense; "eaten" is the past participle.
The past tense is didn't eat.
The past tense of build is built. The past tense of burst stays the same (burst). The past tense of do is did. The past tense of eat is ate. The past tense of go is went. The past tense of ride is rode. The past tense of ring is rang.
No. Eat is present tense, ate is past tense, and eaten is the past participle.
Ate is the past tense of the word eat. Its a past tense word
Yes, it is the past tense of eat.
to eat in past tense
Eaten is the past participle of "eat" The simple past tense is "ate"