Difficulties of Iltutamish
When Iltutmish
became the ruler in 1211, he had a large number of difficulties to face. Instead of being disheartened by them, he faced them boldly and overcame them all. He took prompt action against Qutbi
and Muizzi
Maliks
and gave them a crushing defeat in the neighbourhood of Delhi. He consolidated his position in the area around Delhi. He also secured a letter of manumission from Yildoz.
Yildoz
Taj-ud-Din
Yildoz
was a formidable foe of Iltutmish.
He considered himself to be the successor of Muhammad Ghori
and was not prepared to allow the Muslim Empire in India to be independent. In 1214, Yildoz
came to Lahore and occupied the same. This was too much for Iltutmish.
He marched against Yildoz
and defeated him in the Battle of Tarain
near Thanesar.
Yildoz
was made a prisoner and sent to the fortress of Badaun
where he was later on put to death. It was in this way that Iltutmish
was successful in disposing of one of his enemies.
Qabacha
Iltutmish
was also successful against Nasir-ud-din
Qabacha
who ruled over Uch
and Multan. After the death of Qutb-ud-Din,
Qabacha
had occupied even a portion of the Punjab. As Qabacha
refused to recognize Iltutmish
as overlord, lltutmish
declared war against him in 1217 and he was successful in driving him out of the Punjab. As the power of Qabacha
was not completely crushed,' he managed to remain independent for another decade.
In 1227, Iltutmish
once again marched against him and was successful in capturing Uch
without much resistance. Qabacha
escaped from Uch
and took shelter in Bhakkar.
When Bhakkar
also was besieged by Iltutmish,
Qabacha
lost heart and asked for peace. He sent his son Masud
Bahram
to negotiate the terms but he was impirisoned.
Qabacha
was so much upset that he tried to escape from Bhakkar
but was drowned in the River Indus. One view is that he was killed in an accident. Still another view is that he committed suicide. Whatever the truth, Iltutmish
captured Bhakkar
and appointed Vizir
Muhammad Junaidi
to complete the conquest for Lower Sindh.
Bengal
After the death of Qutb-ud-Din
Aibak,
Ali Mardan
declared himself independent in Bengal and took up the title of Ala-ud-Din.
However, he died after two years. He was succeeded by his son Hisam-ud-Din
Iwaz.
The latter took up the title of Ghias-ud-Din
and struck coins in his own name. Even the Khutba
was read in his name. This was too much for Iltutmish
to put up with such defiance. No wonder, he sent an expedition against him in 1225 and he followed the same.
Ghias-ud-Din
heard the approach of Iltutmish,
he at once submitted and agreed to lay a huge sum as tribute. The submission of Ghias-ud-Din
was not a lasting one and after some he once again raised the standard of revolt. Another expedition was sent against him.
Ghias-ud-Din
was defeated and killed and Bengal was completely brought under the throne of Delhi. When Nasir-ud-Din
who had conquered Bengal died in 1229, the Khalji
Maliks
revolted in lengal
under Balka.
Iltutmish
himself went to Bengal at the head of the army and defeated Balka
id put Ala-ud-Din
Jani
in charge of Bengal.
The Rajputs
After the death of Aibak,
the Rajputs
did their best to drive away theTurks.The
Chandelas
covered Kalinjar
and Ajaigarh.
The Pratiharas
drove away the Muslim Garrisons from Gwalior d reoccupied the city. They also occupied Narwar
and Jhansi.
The Chauhan
Ruler of Ranthambhor
rends out the Turkish troops and brought under his control Jodhpur
and the adjacent areas.
The hauhans
of Jalor
conquered once again Nadol,
Mandor,
Bharmer,
Ratnapur,
Sanchor,
Radhadhara,
hera,
Ramasin
and Bhinamal.
Jadon
Bhattis
established their sovereignty in Northern Alwar,
Bayana
and Thangir
put an end to Turkish supremacy and became independent.
Iltutmish
could not be expected to allow the Rajputs
to remain independent for long. In 1226, he besieged Ranthambhor,
captured it and regarrisoned
it. Mandor,
capital of the Parmara
Rajputs,
was also captured and regarrisoned.
Next he besieged Jalor.
Udai
Singh,
its ruler, offered stiff Resistance.
Ultimately, he was made to surrender. However, he was allowed to continue as ruler, on the condition of his payment of tribute. Bayana
and Thangir
were also recaptured. Ajmer
was captured after stiff resistance. Nagair
in Jodhpur
was recovered. In 1231, Gwalior was besieged. Malayavarma
Deva, it ruler, fought bravely but ultimately surrendered.
Trilokyavarma,
the ruler of Kalinjar,
abandoned Kalinjar
and the same was plundered. However, the Chandelas
were able to trun
out the Muslims once again. Iltutmish
led the attack on Nagada
in person. However, he was defeated by Ksetra
Singh,
its ruler and Iltutmish
suffered heavy losses. Iltutmish
tried to subdue jthe
Chalukyas
of Gujarat but he was unsuccessful.
In 1234-35, Iltutmish
led an expedition to Malwa.
He plundered Bhilsa
and Ujjain.
He also destroyed the temple of Mahakal
at Ujjain.
The contention of Sir Wolseley
Haig
is that Iltutmish
conquered and annexed Malwa
but it appears that it was merely a raid and not a war of conquest.
The Doab
Badaun
Kanauj,
Banaras
and Katehar
(Rohilkhand)
etc., asserted their independence in the time of Iltutmish.
However, as soon as Iltutmish
was able to re-establish
his authority, he took
action against them. One by one, Badaun,
Kanauj
and Banaras
were recaptured.
The same was the case with Katehar.
An expedition was sent to Bahraich
and the same was captured. Avadh
was also brought under Delhi after stiff resistance. It was found difficult to defeat a local tribe which was fighting under their chief named Bartu
or Pirthu.
The Turks were defeated by them on many occasions and more than a lakh
of the troops were destroyed by them. It was only after the death of Prithu
that the local tribes were subdued. Expeditions were also sent against Chandwara
and Tirhut.
The Mongols
In the year 1221, the Mongols appeared for the first time on the banks of the river Indus under their famous leader Changiz
Khan who had overrun the countries of Central and Western Asia with lightning rapidity.' When he attacked Jalal-ud-Din
Mangabami,
the last Shah crKhwarizm
of Khiva,
the latter fled to the Punjab. He asked Iltutmish
to give him shelter.
Iltutmish
felt that by helping Jalal-ud-Din
he would be inviting trouble from Changiz
Khan. Consequently he wrote back saying that although he had no objection to giving him shelter, he was afraid that the climate of the Punjab would not suit him.
This was a very polite way of refusing the request. The result was that Jalal-ud-Din
entered into an alliance with the Khokhars.
He defeated Nasir-ud-Din
Qabacha
of Multan and plundered Sindh
and Northern Gujarat. After that he went away to Persia.
The Mongols also retired. Thus, the infant Muslim Empire in India was saved. The last expedition of Iltutmish
was directed against Banian.
According to Raverty,
this was situated in hill tracts of the Sindh
Sagar
Doab
or in the country immediately West of the Salt Range. Iltutmish
was attacked on the way by such a severe illness that he had to be carried back to Delhi in a litter. The disease proved fatal and he died on 29 April, 1236.
The famous Qutb
Minar
near Mehrauli
in Delhi was got completed by Iltutmish
in the year 1231 -1232. It stands as a testimony to the greatness of Iltutmish.
The Qutb
Minar
was not named after Qutb-ud-Din
Aibak
but after Khwaja
Qutb-ud-Din-a
native of Uch
near Baghdad who had come to live in Hindustan and was held in great esteem by Iltutmish
and others. Out of gratitude, Iltutmish
got the names of his patrons, Qutb-ub-Din
Aibak
and Sultan Muiz-ud-Din,
inscribed on it. A magnificent mosque was also built by the orders of the Sultan.
The reign of Iltutmish
saw the decline of Lahore and the rise of Delhi. Delhi gradually became the greatest centre of learning and culture in the East. Great scholars like Nur-ud-Din,
Mohammad Aufi,
Minhaj-us-Siraj
and Hasan
Nizami
were assembled in his court. Likewise, many saints, artists and artisans also flocked to Delhi. The result was that Delhi became "Second Baghdad."
Minhajus
Siraj
tells us that Changiz
Khan was a tall, well built man, with a robust frame. He had eat-like
eyes. He was extremely brave, wise, far-sighted,
clever and just, excellent in administration and in over-throwing
his enemies.
He was a terrible killer and a ferocious blood-shedder.
His justice was so severe that no one except the owner had the courage to pick up a whip that had fallen by the road-side
An idea of the havoc brought by Changiz
Khan in his conquests is given by Juwayni
in these words : "Wherever there was a king or a ruler or the Governor of a city that offered him resistance, Changiz
Khan annihilated him together with his family and his followers, kinsmen and strangers, so that where there had been a hundred thousand people, there remained, without exaggeration, not a hundred souls alive, as a proof of which statement may be cited the fate of various cities. "
After capturing the town of Khwarizm
which lay in shambles the Mongols drove the people into the open More than a hundred thousand craftsmen were selected and sent to the countries of the east. The children and the young women were taken away as captives Order was given for the rest to be slaughtered Every Mongol soldier had to execute 24 persons. No inhabitants were left.
After the fall of Nishapur.
All of its inhabitants were brought out and slaughtered even cats and dogs were not spared. The result is that nothing remains now on the site to the great historic city. After the fall of the Fort of Taliqan
all its inhabitants were massacred.
Even cats and dogs were not spared. "The wombs of pregnant women were cut open, the heads of babies were severed, and the ramparts, palaces and houses were levelled with the ground." Prof. Habib
says that the ruthlessness of Changiz
Khan enabled him to unite the Steppeuluses
into a homogeneous unit by the complete annihilation of all rival chiefs.
His high grade intelligence cannot be doubted, nor was his genius for organisation, but his military victory due primarily to his capacity for striking below the belt - to his meanness of character in attacking the civil population on a wholesale scale.
The Delhi Sultanate owes the outlines of its administrative system to Iltutmish.
He organised the Revenue and Finance Departments. This was a task which had not been attempted by any other Muslim Ruler in India before him. An administrative structure could not be built without the support of the Turkish Nobility and that could be done either by fear or through favour.
The first was out of the question as the Muslim State in India was in its infancy and there was also the danger of Mongol invasions and opposition from the Hindus. No wonder, Iltutmish
tackled the problem in a spirit of reconciliation and compromise.
He divided the Empire into several Iqtas
which were assigned to various nobles. Every Iqtadar
had to maintain Law and Order and collect revenue. After deducting his salary and the expenses of the Government, he sent the surplus revenue to the Central Government.
The Iqtadari
system differed from the feudal system of Europe. The Iqtadars
were not the owners of the land allotted to them. They were mere functionaries. They could be transferred from one assignment to another and could even be deprived of their Iqtas
at the sweet will of the Emperor.
It is true that the Iqtadari
system was not an ideal one but it suited the needs of the moment. The system also satisfied the vanity of the nobles and they could be prevented from frittering away their energy in mutual fights or in opposing the Emperor.
In order to check the tendency on the part of the nobles to become too powerful, Iltutmish
set up an official nobility of slaves known as the Chahalgani
or the corps of forty. As the members of the Chahalgani
were the personal slaves of the Emperor, the latter could depend on their loyalty and allegiance and through them could keep a grip over the affairs of the Government.
It cannot be denied that by establishing peace and by curbing the centriftigal
forces, Iltutmish
created a sort of political unity and a centralised government which guaranteed protection to the. People both from foreign invasion and internal disturbances.
Iltutmish
inscribed upon his coins the proud legend "The Mighty Sultan, Sun of the Empire and the Faith, Conquest laden Iltutmish"
and "Aid of the Commander of the Faithful." Before Iltutmish,
the Muslim rulers issued small bullion coins of the native form and inscribed their names sometimes in Nagari
script and sometimes in Arabic. Those coins also bore symbols familiar to the Hindus, such as the bull of Shiva and the horseman. Iltutmish
was the first who introduced a purely Arabic coinage. He adopted as his standard coin the silver tanka,
the ancestor of the rupee, weighing 175 grains. Gold tankas
of the same weight were introduced later on by Balban.
Iltutmish
was a pious Muslim. He was very particular about his five daily prayers. However, he was intolerant towards the Shias.
No wonder, the Ismail-Shias
revolted against him but their revolt was crushed. A large number of them were put to death.
His treatment of the Hindus was also not enlightened. He continued to persecute them. Iltutmish
cannot be described as a constructive statesman. However, through his courage and bravery, he was able to save the infant Muslim empire in India. He continued the work started by Qutb-ud-Din
Aibak.
First Of all,the question is wrong - its when WAS iltutmish born. and the answer , is not on the internet anywhere, im sorry. if you have the answer, plz, plz add you answer AFTER this .
Type your answer here... rajiya
Iltutmish nominated his daughter as his successor as none of his sons were aligible for this post. she was a just woman and sat in an open durbar. she dressed like a man and rode horses while she went for battle.
the boat could have sinked && they could have died ....
Raziyya (1236-1240), the eldest daughter of Sultan Shams-ud-din Iltutmish was the Empress of Delhi Sultanate.
Iltutmish died on 1236-05-01.
why did iltutmish choose raziya as his successor
First Of all,the question is wrong - its when WAS iltutmish born. and the answer , is not on the internet anywhere, im sorry. if you have the answer, plz, plz add you answer AFTER this .
Type your answer here... rajiya
iltutmish`s!
No
patna
Iltutmish was a 13th-century ruler of the Delhi Sultanate in India. He is known for consolidating the Sultanate's control over northern India and establishing a strong administrative system. Iltutmish implemented various reforms, strengthened the economy, and promoted cultural development during his rule.
Iltutmish
He was the third ruler during the Mamluk Dynasty of Delhi.
Azimabad (Patna)
iltutmish was the most famous in the slave dynasty.