Any kind they could get their bloody little hands on. In Roman times, there was no popular sense of species fragility: creatures were just there until they weren't. There were subspecies of African megafauna that went extinct as a result of Romans supplying them to the blood sports in their arenas.
Wild animals
no they killed animals not there own kind
The influence and control of the Roman Empire did not extend past the northernmost parts of Africa. As the abundance of wildlife currently found on the continent of Africa demonstrates, the Romans didn't even put a dent in the number of animals in Africa, much less "kill all the animals in Africa".
No, the SS had a reputation for being kind to animals.
They kill anything smaller than itself, and if its a bear for instance they kill in a pack
knives and stuff
they kill them sometimes for meat
bows and arrows.
it is a buffalo
They hunted large animals, such as bison, horse, mammoth, etc.
Huskies are not hunting dogs. They are used, if working, at pulling sleds. Hunting dogs don't kill the animals, only fetch them for the hunter.
While some species of ants have venom that can kill small animals and insects, most ants are not able to kill larger animals. However, certain species of army ants are known to overwhelm larger prey in groups and can potentially kill them.