animal testing has in fact been proven unreliable. Animals are physically very different that humans. Common tests such as the Draize test, have been proven irrelevant and a waste of time and money, that could be put into finding a suitable alternative.
all deaths in animal testing are unnecessary. animals and humans regularly have different reactions to drugs and other things they test, so it is almost never accurate.
Animal testing helps to cure diseases and to discover new cures and vaccines for both, animals AND humans. It is totally normal that humans use animals to test on because we use nature for our own health. However, animal testing used for cosmetics is completely cruel and unnecessary.
NOTHING! All it does is test beauty products and see if they are safe for humans. They test drugs and medicine as well as unnecessary beauty products
The RSPCA (Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals) opposes animal testing and advocates for the reduction, refinement, and replacement of animals in scientific research. They believe that animals should not be subjected to unnecessary suffering and that alternative methods should be prioritized. The organization supports the development of non-animal testing methods and calls for stricter regulations to protect animals used in experiments.
no it is not as bad then animal testing
SUPER EXPTREMLY EXPENSIVE animal testing is the cheapest and most efficiant way
Yes, animal testing is around the whole world !
No. There is no legal requirement for animal testing.
well if the testing is from animal haters the animal will die but if they are good it will live......
if you believe in animal testing...you have no morals,,,i no this because i just wrote a 5 page paper on animal testing and its horrid
Animal testing sould be illegal because it is harming the animal.
It is a slightly grey area, but generally no.