I believe that the renter of the apartment should be told before the transaction if there is a limit. if not, i dont think so. of course, they could always evict people, but, i feel that it is very unreasonable for one to put a limit on how many times oyu clean your carpet YEARLY. I understand if one is cleaning it every single day because that could upset the people on the floor below, or the people in the neighboring rooms.
If the tenant made it dirty, he should clean it. If the tenant moves out and leaves it dirty it should be charged against his cle aning deposit. Anything else needs to be spelled out in the rental agreement.
When a tenant doesn't pay his rent the landlord may begin eviction proceedings in court, which forces the tenant to move.
Landlord, but probably only once a year. The landlord should have a tech check the filters.
Some places have certain stipulations for how often carpet must be replaced in a rental unit. Others will replace only when it is needed. Call someone locally to learn your tenant rights.
Yes. If a tenant is not in the habit of making a lot of noise then the landlord would not have much grounds to evict them. However, if a tenant is a problem for other renters, how a landlord evicts someone depends on the state in which he lives. Usually, a landlord could evict a person even if they have a lease for violating city codes for noise. A landlord would be wise to put such stipulations in their leases. This is based on the number of complaints the police receive concerning the noise or the number of complaints a landlord receives. In some states, all a landlord has to do is send a registered letter to the tenant notifying them of the complaint and that they are on notice to cease and desist or face eviction. If the tenant continues to bother others with their noise, then the landlord can notify the Sheriff's Department to evict the tenant. Of course this will not prevent the tenant from taking the landlord to court. This is why the landlord needs to keep good records and copies of police reports concerning the tenant to use in court.
Not necessarily: he can have the carpet professionally cleaned.
No, there is no requirements to replace carpet, ever, as long as it doesn't pose a health issue.
The possessive forms are landlord's and tenant's; for example:The tenant's apartment is the best one in the landlord's building.
James C. Hauser has written: 'Florida residential landlord--tenant manual' -- subject(s): Landlord and tenant 'Texas residential landlord-tenant law' -- subject(s): Landlord and tenant
If the landlord provided a key to the tenant, then the tenant must provide a key to the landlord. In fact, under most state laws the tenant may not change a lock without the landlord's permission and a duplicate key provided to the landlord.
If a landlord plans to make upgrades to a tenant's apartment, they will usually pay for the tenant to stay somewhere else, like a hotel. While the tenant is gone, their apartment will get new carpet, paint, or whatever else is needed to make it nicer.
Landlord.
Yes. The tenant should be considered the landlord of the sub-tenant. Therefore, he can evict, just like any landlord.
Yes, it is appropriate for a Landlord to give a resident pointers on how to care for new carpet. It would also be appropriate to discuss care of a new oven or refrigerator. The investment is the landlord's and the tenant is expected to live in an apartment without damaging it (except for standard wear and tear). We have rental units and have put new carpet in for residents who have lived in our building a long time, we also have painted for tenants, replaced refrigerators, stoves, heating units. All of these at no charge to the tenant. When a long-term tenant moves out, we have a whole remodel to accomplish in order to re-rent and get good tenants who want things nice and are likely to keep them nice. - A Landlord's point of view.
I am presuming we have three components here: a landlord, a tenant, and a subtenant. The landlord in this case is presumably renting to a tenant, while the tenant is presumably renting to a subtenant. I presume that tenant has a lease while the subtenant doesn't. The tenant becomes the landlord for the subtenant. Since there is no lease (in most states subletting does not involve a lease) in this case, the tenant who is the subtenant landlord can evict the subtenant. While the main landlord can evict the tenant -which automatically evicts the subtenant -only the tenant can evict the subtenant. But the main landlord can evict all by evicting the tenant.
A landlord is generally a person owns property for rent. A tenant is someone who rents property from a landlord.
The landlord or tenant can pay for the tenant improvements