No you can't, once someone has already written and copyrighted it, you can't
No, the painting is not copyright. The longest duration available is 70 years after the death of the creator. Vincent van Gogh died in 1890, meaning the last copyright expired in 1960. Copies and photographs of the painting created by others of his works could still be covered by copyright, which means you are not free to use someone else's image. And exact copies can be considered as attempts at fraud or forgery.
When 2 people, usually parents, both feel the same way about something that they are talking to someone else about.
If you took the item without their consent, it is stealing.
Yes; just go to YouTube.com and sign up for an account. Ask someone else how to sign up, though.
'Opposite' has no comparative or superlative form. Something is either opposite something else (or opposite to something else), or it is not.
No. That is copyright infringement.
Transfer of copyright can be handled by a simple written agreement. Most legal form companies offer them cheaply, but explicit (and free) instructions are in the copyright law, linked below.
When you directly quote what someone else has written without their written consent. When you offer free downloading of a popular song that was just released or is still in copyright (95 years in most cases).
Plagiarism is when someone uses someone else's work without giving credit, while copyright infringement is when someone uses someone else's work without permission.
Copyright text is basically anything that someone else has written. You cannot use copyright text unless the owner has given you permission.
It depends on who owns the trademark (you or someone else), the nature of the copyrighted work, and how you're using the trademark in the work.
The photographer owns the copyright of any photograph unless there is a written and signed agreement with a client that states otherwise. If the photographer is an employee of someone else and being paid for his employment, then the employer is legally the "author" and owns the copyright, under US law. It is quite possible, and often the case, that a person may own the only copy of a photograph but someone else owns the entire copyright but no copies.
No. It is illegal to use someone's images from Photobucket or from anywhere (either digital or not) without written permission from whoever owns the copyright to that image. It is usually, but not always, the photographer who took the image that retains the copyright.
You can record your own or get them of someone else but you have to have the copyright in words for people to read.
Fines for copyright infringement vary from country to country; in the US, fees are $750-$30,000.
This means that the person did not mean to break any copyright laws when they were using someone Else's idea.
If you have shot your own video or written your own music, and someone else copies it without your written permission, then you can ask YouTube to remove that person's copy. If you created the music and the images yourself, you can do anything you want with it. If someone else created it, you have to get their permission.