0
French voters supported Napoleon's decision to appoint himself Emperor because?
Wiki User
∙ 14y ago
... they had had six different constitutions and innumerable governments in 15 years, and felt themselves safer in the hands of a strong man whose succession would be assured by heredity rather than politics.
Wiki User
∙ 14y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Is the word appoint a happy feeling or a sad feeling?
The word appoint is not a feeling, it is the action when youelectsomeone for a role.For example: The Queen appointed David Cameron to be Prime Minister.
Where did all the power in the government go to according to the Articles of confederation?
The Articles of Confederation did create a national government composed of a Congress, that had the power to declare war, sign treaties, appoint military officers, make alliances, appoint foreign ambassadors, make alliances, and manage relations with Indians.
How did billy Carter impact on Jimmy Carter's term in office?
Jimmy Tried to appoint Billy to the Supreme Court but there was no vacancy.
What committee is responsible for selecting the permanent chairperson of the national convention?
the committee's chairperson whose duty it is to appoint a successor
In what year did Hindenburg appoint Hitler chancellor of the nazi party?
Hitler was elected to the Reichstag in 1933 as leader of the Nazional Sozialistishe Deutche Abeiter Partei. This was the largest party in the Reichstag (German Parliament/Congress) and as such he became Chanceller(Prime Minister) 0f Germany at the (very reluctant) appointment of President Hindenberg.
Why did Diocletian divide the empire and appoint a co-emperor?
it was too big and to make easy to manage.
Why did Justinian think he had the right to appoint a pope?
Because the Church's own second Council in Constantinople had decided in 550 AD that nothing in the Church could be done or decided if the Emperor did not agree with it; which basically made the Church subject to the Emperor. No-one within the Church had protested when he single-handedly appointed Rome as the supreme See of the Western Catholic Church. So if he could - on the basis of the Second Counsel-decision of the Church itself - appoint Rome as the See of the Pope unopposed, why shouldn't he be able to appoint (or at least be autorized to approve the selection) of the new Pope?
One good way to counteract groupthink in decision making is to?
appoint a "devil's advocate" to argue against the majority view.
What steps should a person take if he or she wishes to make a responsible decision about alcohol?
Appoint a designated driver.
How was it decided who succeeded the emperor?
Ideally the new emperor was the old emperor's heir, or someone that the previous emperor appointed. In reality, there was often chaos on the death of an emperor, as many times the emperors did not appoint anyone to succeed them. When this occurred there was a political scramble for the top job, with bribes liberally distributed. Ultimately the senate confirmed the new man as emperor, but this was a technicality, as during the principate the senate was no more than a rubber stamp.Ideally the new emperor was the old emperor's heir, or someone that the previous emperor appointed. In reality, there was often chaos on the death of an emperor, as many times the emperors did not appoint anyone to succeed them. When this occurred there was a political scramble for the top job, with bribes liberally distributed. Ultimately the senate confirmed the new man as emperor, but this was a technicality, as during the principate the senate was no more than a rubber stamp.Ideally the new emperor was the old emperor's heir, or someone that the previous emperor appointed. In reality, there was often chaos on the death of an emperor, as many times the emperors did not appoint anyone to succeed them. When this occurred there was a political scramble for the top job, with bribes liberally distributed. Ultimately the senate confirmed the new man as emperor, but this was a technicality, as during the principate the senate was no more than a rubber stamp.Ideally the new emperor was the old emperor's heir, or someone that the previous emperor appointed. In reality, there was often chaos on the death of an emperor, as many times the emperors did not appoint anyone to succeed them. When this occurred there was a political scramble for the top job, with bribes liberally distributed. Ultimately the senate confirmed the new man as emperor, but this was a technicality, as during the principate the senate was no more than a rubber stamp.Ideally the new emperor was the old emperor's heir, or someone that the previous emperor appointed. In reality, there was often chaos on the death of an emperor, as many times the emperors did not appoint anyone to succeed them. When this occurred there was a political scramble for the top job, with bribes liberally distributed. Ultimately the senate confirmed the new man as emperor, but this was a technicality, as during the principate the senate was no more than a rubber stamp.Ideally the new emperor was the old emperor's heir, or someone that the previous emperor appointed. In reality, there was often chaos on the death of an emperor, as many times the emperors did not appoint anyone to succeed them. When this occurred there was a political scramble for the top job, with bribes liberally distributed. Ultimately the senate confirmed the new man as emperor, but this was a technicality, as during the principate the senate was no more than a rubber stamp.Ideally the new emperor was the old emperor's heir, or someone that the previous emperor appointed. In reality, there was often chaos on the death of an emperor, as many times the emperors did not appoint anyone to succeed them. When this occurred there was a political scramble for the top job, with bribes liberally distributed. Ultimately the senate confirmed the new man as emperor, but this was a technicality, as during the principate the senate was no more than a rubber stamp.Ideally the new emperor was the old emperor's heir, or someone that the previous emperor appointed. In reality, there was often chaos on the death of an emperor, as many times the emperors did not appoint anyone to succeed them. When this occurred there was a political scramble for the top job, with bribes liberally distributed. Ultimately the senate confirmed the new man as emperor, but this was a technicality, as during the principate the senate was no more than a rubber stamp.Ideally the new emperor was the old emperor's heir, or someone that the previous emperor appointed. In reality, there was often chaos on the death of an emperor, as many times the emperors did not appoint anyone to succeed them. When this occurred there was a political scramble for the top job, with bribes liberally distributed. Ultimately the senate confirmed the new man as emperor, but this was a technicality, as during the principate the senate was no more than a rubber stamp.
The concordat of worms was a fair compromise for both the emperor and the church why or why not?
yes because it gave the church the right to appoint bishops
Was the concordat of worms a fair compromise for both the emperor and the church Why or why not?
yes because it gave the church the right to appoint bishops
Who is the emperor in Japan descended from today?
According article 1. The Emperor shall be the symbol of the State and of the unity of the people, deriving his position from the will of the people with whom resides sovereign power. According article 4. The Emperor shall perform only such acts in matters of state as are provided for in the Constitution and he shall not have powers related to government. Acording article 6: 1. The Emperor shall appoint the Prime Minister as designated by the Diet. 2. Emperor shall appoint the Chief Judge of the Supreme Court as designated by the Cabinet.
When Octavian became emperor did he do away with the Roman senate?
When Octavian became emperor he was very careful not only to keep the senate, but to appoint new members. As his was a transitional government (at least at first), he took great pains to give the appearance of the republic.
How were emperors chosen in rome?
Ideally the emperors were chosen by inheritance. A reigning emperor would appoint his successor. However sometimes an emperor died without designating an heir and then the man with the strongest military backing took over.Ideally the emperors were chosen by inheritance. A reigning emperor would appoint his successor. However sometimes an emperor died without designating an heir and then the man with the strongest military backing took over.Ideally the emperors were chosen by inheritance. A reigning emperor would appoint his successor. However sometimes an emperor died without designating an heir and then the man with the strongest military backing took over.Ideally the emperors were chosen by inheritance. A reigning emperor would appoint his successor. However sometimes an emperor died without designating an heir and then the man with the strongest military backing took over.Ideally the emperors were chosen by inheritance. A reigning emperor would appoint his successor. However sometimes an emperor died without designating an heir and then the man with the strongest military backing took over.Ideally the emperors were chosen by inheritance. A reigning emperor would appoint his successor. However sometimes an emperor died without designating an heir and then the man with the strongest military backing took over.Ideally the emperors were chosen by inheritance. A reigning emperor would appoint his successor. However sometimes an emperor died without designating an heir and then the man with the strongest military backing took over.Ideally the emperors were chosen by inheritance. A reigning emperor would appoint his successor. However sometimes an emperor died without designating an heir and then the man with the strongest military backing took over.Ideally the emperors were chosen by inheritance. A reigning emperor would appoint his successor. However sometimes an emperor died without designating an heir and then the man with the strongest military backing took over.
Did roman emperor's have the power to appoint members of the senate?
Yes, in fact appointing able and capable men to the senate, regardless of their birth or wealth, was one of the reasons that the rule of Augustus was so successful. The emperor, because he was head of state during the principate, could appoint all the magistrates which automatically made them members of the senate.Yes, in fact appointing able and capable men to the senate, regardless of their birth or wealth, was one of the reasons that the rule of Augustus was so successful. The emperor, because he was head of state during the principate, could appoint all the magistrates which automatically made them members of the senate.Yes, in fact appointing able and capable men to the senate, regardless of their birth or wealth, was one of the reasons that the rule of Augustus was so successful. The emperor, because he was head of state during the principate, could appoint all the magistrates which automatically made them members of the senate.Yes, in fact appointing able and capable men to the senate, regardless of their birth or wealth, was one of the reasons that the rule of Augustus was so successful. The emperor, because he was head of state during the principate, could appoint all the magistrates which automatically made them members of the senate.Yes, in fact appointing able and capable men to the senate, regardless of their birth or wealth, was one of the reasons that the rule of Augustus was so successful. The emperor, because he was head of state during the principate, could appoint all the magistrates which automatically made them members of the senate.Yes, in fact appointing able and capable men to the senate, regardless of their birth or wealth, was one of the reasons that the rule of Augustus was so successful. The emperor, because he was head of state during the principate, could appoint all the magistrates which automatically made them members of the senate.Yes, in fact appointing able and capable men to the senate, regardless of their birth or wealth, was one of the reasons that the rule of Augustus was so successful. The emperor, because he was head of state during the principate, could appoint all the magistrates which automatically made them members of the senate.Yes, in fact appointing able and capable men to the senate, regardless of their birth or wealth, was one of the reasons that the rule of Augustus was so successful. The emperor, because he was head of state during the principate, could appoint all the magistrates which automatically made them members of the senate.Yes, in fact appointing able and capable men to the senate, regardless of their birth or wealth, was one of the reasons that the rule of Augustus was so successful. The emperor, because he was head of state during the principate, could appoint all the magistrates which automatically made them members of the senate.
What is a sentence with the word appoint?
We will appoint a new leader soon.She hoped they would appoint her.I hope the next person they appoint is charismatic.
