The representatives said that the elected officials ruled in the people's name. (the Federalists also agreed with that)
Oligarchy - 'rule by the few' - an aristocratic cartel which excluded ordinary people. Tyranny - rule by a single man appointed to get rid of the oligarchs and give the ordinary people a government which looked after their interests. Democracy - 'people power' - which gave the ordinary people a say in their government.
A long time ago when it was federlists (national rights) and anti-federlists (state rights) people who were anti-federlists the democrats were more of farmers and middle to low class people. On the other hand the federalists the republicans were high class business men the urban type. But now Republicans and Democrats are spread through out the whole country.
Most Republicans, Democrats, Liberals, Conservatives, and Independents are good people who just differ on their point of view about government.
No, republicans are the people that would throw you 60 feet of rope, and not allow the government to throw you any rope. They believe in individual action, not government action. New tea party republicans have always made it a point to bring back the government, but a recent GALLUP poll showed that republicans gave more to charity than democrats. Politics is not divided between rich and poor, but rather to contrary political beliefs, they will forever be debated.
Federalists wanted to support England and also wanted a strong and powerful government, a national bank, and a loose interpretation of the Coast. The Democratic-Republicans wanted to support France and also wanted a small federal government, no national bank, and a strict interpretation of the Coast.
The representatives said that the elected officials ruled in the people's name. (the Federalists also agreed with that)
The Federalists viewed the people as lesser than them and the people should not run the government. The Republicans viewed the people greatly like they should run the government.
The representatives said that the elected officials ruled in the people's name. (the Federalists also agreed with that)
The main difference between federalists and republicans is that federalists believe all power should reside in the government, while republicans believe that power should reside in the people.
The main difference between federalists and republicans is that federalists believe all power should reside in the government, while republicans believe that power should reside in the people.
Republican!
Yes, there are also republicans and antifederalists
The "anti-federalists were known as the Democratic-Republicans. They were led primarily by Thomas Jefferson and James Madison. The anti-federalists were people who believed that the federal government should not be so strong as to overwhelm the power and sovereignty of the states.
The federalists believed that regular, hardworking, and patriotic people should govern. They did not believe in people governing based on the families they were from.
The Federalists believed that the wealthy should be in control and they believed in a more centralized government, while the Democratic-Republicans believed that the common people should have more control and had more reliance on the agriculture in their areas.
The anti-Federalists or Democratic Republicans, They were not happy with the Constitution because it gave too much power to the federal government at the expense of the individual states. They also were afraid the federal government would trample on the rights of the people so they insisted on adding the Bill of Rights to it just so that it would be clear that the new federal government would not become a new monarchy that was just overthrown. The Federalists were thrilled with it.
The Anti-Federalists, sometimes called Republicans, held a different view of the role of government. Anti-Federalists were typically from agrarian rather than urban regions. They felt that government should never be too far removed from the common people, and feared that a national government with too much power would not act in the interest of the majority of its citizens.