If a copy artist reproduced one of Monet's paintings, it is likely that he/she would have also reproduced Monet's painted signature, unless the distinction as a copy was meant to be obvious. A "print" of a painting is, by definition, a copy of the original painting and would therefore include the painted signature - obscuration of the signature would constitute a defacement of the original in the process of print production.
It depends on whether or not the signature is real or fake.
wishing well lane lithograph authenticated by the franklin mint
yes
First thing that MUST be determined is whether the "signature" is actually a signature or is a printed signature. To test for printed or real, tilt the print toward a light bulb and using a magnifying glass look for the pixels to either have dots in the signature or see if there is a layer of blue or blank ink laying on top of the image pixels. If it is signed, then you need to check for authenticity. The best way is to find someone of known honesty who is selling something signed by the artist and compare your signature with the one known to be real. A real Norman Rockwell signature on a print would be worth $300-500 USD. A real Norman Rockwell signature on a authentic painting would be determined by the current auction rate for a similar painting by him of the same size.
I have a copy of the photographed m.t. Johanson pair of mallards lithograph
5 dollars at the max
A specimen signature is an official 'copy' of your signature that is kept on file and if needed in the future can be used to verify if a signature is genuine.
himayath
A copy of a Babe Ruth contract, or a copy/reproduction of any vintage signature or piece of memorabilia, would have little perceived value to collectors. While an item such as this may frame well with a genuine signature, etc., the actual market value of a copy of anything would be virtually zero, particularly in relation to the Real McCoy.
If a copy artist reproduced one of Monet's paintings, it is likely that he/she would have also reproduced Monet's painted signature, unless the distinction as a copy was meant to be obvious. A "print" of a painting is, by definition, a copy of the original painting and would therefore include the painted signature - obscuration of the signature would constitute a defacement of the original in the process of print production.
/s/ on a signature line means that the signature is on the original document, not on the copy that you're holding. It is a representation that the original document is properly signed, but for some reason you only have an unsigned copy of the document. An unsigned copy of a document may be used for reference only or it may be a file copy (when it is not necessary to have a signed copy of the document).
yes
Don't copy it, it's forging a signature and that is against the law.
It depends on whether or not the signature is real or fake.
Headline Copy Illistration Signature
Hire a handwriting expert