answersLogoWhite

0

That kind of depends upon what you consider 'real'.

There was no king in any of the kingdoms of the time with that name, there was no kingdom of Camelot, nor were there any other 'knights' that are in the tales.

But the stories were created for a purpose, they are as real as the parables or Aesop's fables.

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago

What else can I help you with?

Continue Learning about Art & Architecture

Why King Arthur is the only catholic king of England?

King Arthur is a fictional character not a real one!


Was King Arthur a Norman?

No. The closest you can get to Camelot and King Arthur being real would be that King Arthur was actually a Roman who grew up in Britain and so later became King of "Camelot" Which probably didn't exist. :)


What was king Arthur's government?

King Arthur was never a real British King but a mythical character from stories that originated in the Royal Courts of Europe in the Middle Ages. He has no relevance to the real history of the British Monarchy. In the Myth, the round table was King Arthur's government. The idea was that everybody at it was equal (There was no head of the table).


Is King Arthur real?

Scientists are doing tests and they have confirmed that King Arthur may have existed even though there is no such thing as Camelot.It is still debated whether or not he was real. It is for certain that most, (If not all) of English literature that describes him is false. But there may have been a real King Arthur. And we know that his supposed sucessor, Constantine the Third, was real. Meaning we know that Constantine was a king of Britain, but whether or not he followed Arthur is unknown.not ever person thinks so ,but he might be.people say he is coming to life and is trying to stop moredred.


Was King Arthur a real person yes or no?

There might have been a King Arthur, but there is no historical evidence to back up the stories of the Knights of the Round Table and so forth.