King Arthur is a fictional character not a real one!
Well if king aruther died what do they have of him and the knight
King Arthur is a legendary king and did not exist.
The United Kingdom, King Arthur was supposed to be born in tintagel (England) whilst Merlin was ment to have originated from Wales. However King Arthur is ment to have united the kingdoms of Britain and so is a British ledgand
tournament to decing new king of england
The Actor Bradley James comes from England, and will eventually become King Arthur. [this is if you're referring to the Adventure of Merlin].
No. There are no records of a King Arthur in England, certainly not in Anglo-Saxon England.
King Arthur
He is from England
James II of England was a catholic who became a king in 1685.
King Arthur did not become a knight. He was working for a knight and planning to become one, but he became king first. There was a contest once that Merlin held. Uther Pendragon was king but died. They had to decide who would be king of England so they put a magical sword in a stone. Whoever pulled it out was king of England and King Arthur did.
Well if king aruther died what do they have of him and the knight
England.
No He was not, King George III was head of the Church of England, thus was an Anglican
Well, it's a fact that King Arthur was an actual person, however, his power might have been exaggerated. But yes, the King of England did meet King Arthur.
Camelot
the ruler of England
That would depend on whether you believe king Arthur actually existed. His place in "history" is that of a legend, and if he did exist, he was King of only a small area of England.