Because Accolon had the real Excalibur and even more importantly--the scabbard. Arthur had fakes and he did not realize it until the fight began and Accolon kept wounding the king and Arthur kept losing blood. Accolon felt there was no way he could lose with the magical protection of Excalibur and the scabbard. But Arthur was too good a fighter to begin with.
Yes, in one of the legends Morgan Le Fay stole Excalibur when she captured Arthur and another knight named Accolon, who she was in love with. She forced Arthur and Accolon to fight each other without knowing their opponents identities. Morgan gave Accolon Excalibur and Arthur a regular sword. Accolon broke the sword, but the Lady of the Lake intervened, Arthur snatched up Excalibur, and struck Accolon a mortal blow on the head. It was only after that that Arthur removed his helmet and recognized his friend (not exactly the most rational group of knights in the world). After that, Morgan stole the magic scabbard to Excalibur, but Arthur never recovered that.
Morgan had stolen Excalibur and the scabbard when she plotted to have her lover Accolon fight Arthur to take over the throne. Arthur gets Excalibur back, but Mogan takes the scabbard and flings it into a lake--alas, not one inhabited by the Lady of the Lake, so it was lost forever. So he didn't have it in the battle of Camlann when he fought Mordred.
King Arthur died in a fight with his nephew Mordred. King Arthur fatally wounded Mordred but he was still in tact, so he willingly stabbed King Arthur back before he died.
No, Arthur would have been king prior to the Norman invasion of 1066 AD, and all of the Crusades happened long after that.
King Arthur is a legendary king and did not exist.
The lady of the lake gave King Arthur his magic sword Excalibur. When King Arthur was seriously wounded in his fight with Sir Accolon, she healed his wounds. Otherwise, he probably would have died.
Yes, in one of the legends Morgan Le Fay stole Excalibur when she captured Arthur and another knight named Accolon, who she was in love with. She forced Arthur and Accolon to fight each other without knowing their opponents identities. Morgan gave Accolon Excalibur and Arthur a regular sword. Accolon broke the sword, but the Lady of the Lake intervened, Arthur snatched up Excalibur, and struck Accolon a mortal blow on the head. It was only after that that Arthur removed his helmet and recognized his friend (not exactly the most rational group of knights in the world). After that, Morgan stole the magic scabbard to Excalibur, but Arthur never recovered that.
Morgan had stolen Excalibur and the scabbard when she plotted to have her lover Accolon fight Arthur to take over the throne. Arthur gets Excalibur back, but Mogan takes the scabbard and flings it into a lake--alas, not one inhabited by the Lady of the Lake, so it was lost forever. So he didn't have it in the battle of Camlann when he fought Mordred.
King Arthur died in a fight with his nephew Mordred. King Arthur fatally wounded Mordred but he was still in tact, so he willingly stabbed King Arthur back before he died.
King Arthur fighted fro freedom.He was chosen 12 times to lead the celts.
King Authur was a good King who turn out to fight in a war.
He didn't fight a battle to become King, he just pulled a sword from a stone, which made him King. He did fight many battles later on though.
No, Arthur would have been king prior to the Norman invasion of 1066 AD, and all of the Crusades happened long after that.
Yes, there was a dragon during the king arthur's time....because his nick name was pendragon...AKA. 'Head dragon".....there was times when king arhtur had to sord fight the dragon when the very last time he faught with the dragon King Arthur had killed the Dragon...
He couldn't have since King Arthur is believed to have lived some time during the 6th century and the Vikings did not start raiding until the 8th.
The conflict of the film "King Arthur" revolves around Arthur's struggle to unite the warring kingdoms of Britain against the invading Saxons while also coming to terms with his true identity and destiny as the rightful king. Additionally, there is internal conflict within Arthur's own group of knights, as loyalty and personal agendas come into play.
King Arthur is a legendary king and did not exist.