No.
Another answer:
Yes. Creationist do not accept the theory of evolution as a valid explanation for the development of life and the diversity of species on earth. Many biblical creationist believe creation took place in a literal six day period while other Christians hold to a doctrine of creation without accepting all the aspects of biblical creationism. Biblical creationism is the literal belief of a 6-day creation as some people understand when they read Genesis. As such then Biblical creationism really happens as there are Creationists within the Christian Church (note that creationism is not exclusive to Christianity; other religions have their origin-myths, and believers who hold those myths to be literal truth: creationists).
However, only a small proportion of Christians believe Genesis as literally true, and these are invariably those who have not really studied to depth either the evidence for evolution, nor the deep truths of Genesis, preferring to ignore scientific evidence and reading Genesis simply and naively at face value.
If you asked did 'Creation' really happen, there is no doubt that the universe, space, matter and even time came into existence at a single point in the distant past, whether it is called the 'moment of Creation' or 'the Big Bang'. Both Creationists and scientists agree on this. However, all evidence points to a moment of Creation around 13.7 billion years ago with life on earth evolving over millions of years. However Creationists ignore this compelling evidence and insist on interpreting Genesis literally despite it being written as an allegorical Hebrew poem and never intended, either then or since, as a scientific or literal chronological explanation of the beginning of the world.
So if you mean did 'Creationism' happen - the answer is 'yes' as there are Creationists around today. However, if you mean 'did Creatiion happen' the theist's answer is also 'yes' but almost certainly not as a 6-day Creation that Creationists insist by their naive interpretation of Genesis.
The Institute for Creation Science and Answers in Genesis are just two organisations that have speakers available to give lectures on Creationism.
There are at least two, quite different forms of creationism, and the question of whether creationism is credible must be applied separately to each. No doubt, both Young-Earth creationism and Old-Earth creationism are credible to their proponents, but the question must be whether they are credible to other well informed people.Young-Earth creationism holds that the Earth is only a few thousand years old, usually around six thousand. However, science has proven conclusively that the world is billions of years old, so this can not be credible. Because of the overwhelming evidence that the world is certainly more than six thousand years old, some Young-Earth creationists have adapted Young-Earth creationism by saying that each of the days stated in Genesis chapter 1 was really an almost indefinite period of time. According to this version, the world could be many thousands of years old. This not only undermines the standard Young-Earth creationism argument, but it is even less credible, given that there is no supporting evidence for this, not even biblical evidence.Old-Earth creationism accepts the scientific evidence for the great age of the Earth, so from this point of view it is more credible than Young-Earth creationism. Nevertheless, some Old-Earth creationists say that God created all living things just as they are today. Others accept that species evolved, but say that this was not the result of natural selection but Intelligent Design. Both versions of Old-Earth creationism fail in the face of scientific evidence, although Intelligent Design is more sophisticated and therefore somewhat more credible. Intelligent Design is also claimed by some Young-Earth creationists, perhaps because it has captured the imagination of a proportion of the population, but it seems inherently an Old-Earth creationism concept.Ultimately credibility comes down to whether a hypothesis is compatible with the scientific evidence. Creationists do not put forward scientific evidence to support their hypotheses, instead proposing various ways in which they believe they can undermine the evidence for evolution. Occasionally, scientists respond (eg. Dawkins, Perakh, et al)and demonstrate the failure of these arguments. So, to be credible, creationism has to adapt further, until its claims are at least somewhat consistent with the scientific evidence.For more information, please visit: http://christianity.answers.com/theology/the-story-of-creation
When Charles Hodge wrote "What is Darwinism?" in 1874 and argued that evolution can not explain the complexities of the eye is when creationism was first used as a tool against evolution. Before that, Thomas Aquinas and later William Paley used the design argument to 'prove' God's existence, as a small group in the United States are doing today, and the story of Creation was believed to be literally true by all Christian sects. However, it was not called 'Creationism' as there was no opposing theory at the time.
Atheistic creationism is the view held by a number of idealist and Buddhist philosophers especially in the 19th century and the early 20th century. Basically every object and thing in the universe even down to the smallest atom is a mental creation, created out of mind. Minds are indeed the creators of the universe. But unlike George Berkeleys subjective idealism which was theistic for atheistic creationism there is no divine mind, there is no God. All creations were created from human minds or other forms of life.
It might pop. Maybe But i'm not really sure
Technically, there is no such thing as scientific creationism. Creationism is per definition un- or even anti-scientific.
Answer By definition creationism is theistic.
The ISBN of Creationism's Trojan Horse is 0195157427.
Creationism's Trojan Horse has 416 pages.
Fiat Creationism
Creationism's Trojan Horse was created on 2004-01-08.
No.
In Focus - 2009 Creationism was released on: USA: 10 December 2012
Creationism is the basis of all religions, it is what science says is not true. Teaching it in a public school is illegal.
Creationism can be taught in public schools in America after the Supreme court ruling of Stone v. Graham.
Creationism can and should be taught in a sociology classroom setting, but not in a science classroom like some people want it to be. The reason for this is that creationism is not a scientific theory or even principle, it's part of cultural mythology.
According to a 2009 Pew Research Center survey, about 33 of scientists in the United States believe in creationism.