There are a lot of stars in the universe. Our Galaxy alone is thought to contain 400 billion stars. If you can count 2 stars a second continuously without sleep it would take 200 billion seconds or 6337 years 225 days 13 hours 33 minutes and 20 seconds.
Add to that the fact that there is thought to be about 400 billion galaxies in our universe. Our Galaxy is large by galaxy standards but let us assume that the average number of stars in any given galaxy is 100 billion. So at 2 a second it would take 633.7 trillion years or to put it into perspective 46,154.4 times longer than the universe has thought to existed.
It takes light about 80,000 years to do so. At the speed of the fastest spacecraft yet built by humans, it would take approximately the same time as the current age of the universe to cross the Milky Way.
However, speeds tend to increase greatly as technology improves. 200 years ago, the fastest vehicle on Earth could go about 40 miles per hour; that was a train. 100 years ago, the fastest vehicle was a race car, at about 150 MPH. Today, the space shuttle gets up to about 18,000 MPH getting into orbit. How fast will spacecraft go, 100 years from now? There's no way to guess.
Answer 1: With our current technology, it would be impossible. It could not be done. One of the reasons is that scientists believe that there is a super-massive black hole in the middle of the Milky Way, and probably at the centers of most large galaxies.
Answer 2: Actually, solar sails could probably propel a spacecraft across the galaxy, using solar winds from different stars to accelerate it. It would take an extremely long amount of time, however, probably more than a thousand years.
Answer 3: Solar sails would be interminably slow. It takes our sun 220 million years to orbit the galaxy, so about 110 million years to get from one side to the other. Solar sails could reduce that time. πd = 110,000,000, so d=35 million years, at the sun's speed. That time would be reduced by accelerating towards the Milky Way's massive central black hole. What we gain passing it in time we don't lose on the other side. Clearly, one would simply fly around the little hole, instead of navigating through it. It is smaller in volume than most stars.
A ram scoop, funneling interstellar hydrogen into some sort of fusion engine, could conceivably get you across the Milky Way in much less time yet--possibly as little as a couple hundred thousand years.
That would depend on the speed of your spacecraft. Current human spacecraft would take approximately the current age of the universe to get out of the Milky Way. That's my way of saying "It couldn't be done.".
However, the invention of the aircraft happened only 107 years ago, and we will certainly make equal advances in the next 100 years, and the next... By the year 2500, we may have spacecraft that would be able to exit the Milky Way at near lightspeed, taking "only" about 13,000 years to the galactic rim.
If you counted one star every second, you would still be counting after 12,675 years.
So I suggest you don't start to try!!
That would depend upon the speed of travel.
If you are going across it I think that it would take 100,000 light-years to get to the other side of the Milky Way
That would obviously depend on the speed. At the speed of light, it would take about 100,000 years, since the diameter of the Milky Way is about 100,000 light-years.
80,000 YEARS
4=that would be a universe
A guess: Carl Sagan.
The stars that are bigger than the sun and earth are the stars that are bigger than the sun and those stars are Sirius,Pollux and Arcturus
It would mean that the Universe was contracting and would shortly enter the "Big Crunch" and all time would end along with everything else.
hydrogen and helium. More than just these two elements can be found in stars, though, otherwise we would live in a universe comprised completely of hydrogen and helium.
A lot of time (period of a few human lives) and a good counter, but my opinion is that you can't count them, because there are billions of stars in a galaxy and billions of galaxies in the universe.
Disneyland in my opinion is the best place to be in the entire universe. I would give it as many stars as possible.
yeah God created humans and the entire universe including animals,water and every stars on earth.
If you counted 1 number per second, it would take 4000 trillion months (320 trillion years) to count all 10 billion trillion stars (100 billion per galaxy) in a fictitious version of our universe.
There are a lot of stars in the universe. Our Galaxy alone is thought to contain 400 billion stars. If you can count 2 stars a second continuously without sleep it would take 200 billion seconds or 6337 years 225 days 13 hours 33 minutes and 20 seconds.Add to that the fact that there is thought to be about 400 billion galaxies in our universe. Our Galaxy is large by galaxy standards but let us assume that the average number of stars in any given galaxy is 100 billion. So at 2 a second it would take 633.7 trillion years or to put it into perspective 46,154.4 times longer than the universe has thought to existed.
If you counted at the rate of one number per second, it would take 320 trillion years to count to 10 billion trillion. It makes no difference WHAT you're counting.
broly would destroy the entire universe
If you counted 1 dwarf galaxy per second, it would take 222,000 years to count all 7 trillion dwarf galaxies in the universe.
That question cannot be answered. We would have to know the magnitude of every star in the universe. The universe is infinite (and expanding). It's impossible to answer your question.
It would make sense that the capital should be in the center. But since the universe has no edge, it has no center, which means that no matter where you are in the universe, the view is the same. So the most central location in the universe is the entire universe.
4=that would be a universe
Well neither, you or I would exist. Without the influx of heavy elements, the Universe would be a very sterile place.